Peer Review History: Assessing the Role of Fish Farming in Poverty Alleviation through a Socio-Economic and Factor Analytical Study in Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Forcep Rio Indaryanto, University of Sultan Ageng Tritayasa, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Monisha M, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Tausif Haseeb Khan, Guru Nanak Khalsa College of Arts Science and Commerce, India.

(3) Haider Mashkoor Hussein, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monisha M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tausif Haseeb Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Haider Mashkoor Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable strategies for freshwater aquaculture in India: steering opportunities and future challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Samiran Mukherjee, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

(2) Laurentiu Burlacu, CCAT Solution Group, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enggar Patriono, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia.

(2) Kezang Wangmo, College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samiran Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Laurentiu Burlacu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Parental and Institutional Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Social Media Integration in Education: A Qualitative Study from Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nasser Mustapha, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

(2) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Julie Anne C. Gajes, Nueva Vizcaya State University, Philippines.

(2) Budiawan, Universitas Teknologi Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) AJI, Kingsley Olawale, FCT College of Education, Zuba, Nigeria.

(2) Esmaeil Ghorbani, Bojnurd University, Iran.

(3) Fidan Qerimi, AAB College, Kosovo.

(4) Rakesh Kumar, AAFT University of Media and Arts, India.

(5) Uzma Zaidi, Amity University Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julie Anne C. Gajes, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Budiawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Consumers’ Perceptions of the Environmental Impact of E-Waste Disposal: Evidence from Hyderabad City, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Naibin George, SCMS School of Technology & Management, India.

(2) Madhu, Punjabi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naibin George, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Textural and Physicochemical Properties of ‘Cricket Ball’ Sapota (Manilkara Achras): Post-Harvest Evaluation for Quality Assessment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sakshi Gupta, India.

(2) Alhadj Markhous Nazal, University of Sarh, Chad.

(3) Celile Aylin Oluk, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar Gautam, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sakshi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alhadj Markhous Nazal, Chad) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Celile Aylin Oluk, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) of Anganwadi Teachers in Relation to Nutrition Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ryan C. Fontanilla, International School of Asia and the Pacific , Philippines.

(2) Fareeha Javed, Government Graduate College for Women, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Busa Abdul’aziz Inusa, Federal Universty Dutsin-Ma, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ryan C. Fontanilla, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fareeha Javed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Newer Insecticides against Rice Earhead bug (Leptocorisa acuta Thunberg)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh,  Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Kadir Salam, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

(2) N. Geetha, Sugar Research Institute of Fiji, Fiji.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Kadir Salam, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Geetha, Fiji) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Antibiotic-Resistant Patterns of Zoonotic Escherichia coli in Guenon Monkeys and Humans at the Limbe Zoological Garden

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anjaneyulu Vinukonda, Strides Pharma Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Naser Hussein, Afak General Hospital, Iraq.

(2) Hadeel Mahdi Hussein, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(3) David Otieno Odongo, Ph.D, Moldiate Laboratory, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fattma A.Ali, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

(2) Hadeel Mahdi Hussein, Tikrit university, Iraq.

(3) Hashim Ali Abdulameer Al-sherees, University of Kufa, college of medicine, Iraq.

(4) Vasukidevi Ramachandran, Bharath Institute of Higher Education Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Naser Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hadeel Mahdi Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (David Otieno Odongo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Germination and growth of Artemisia annua seedlings in the Ivorian coastal zone: case of the CNRA Marc DELORME Station

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Ayyaz, Shihezi University (China), Pakistan.

(2) Khairiah., SP., MT, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Ayyaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khairiah., SP., MT, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality of Life after Bariatric Surgery among People with Obesity- Associated Comorbidities: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade And University Medical Center “Bezanijskakosa” Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) John Paul Goh Sczepaniak, United States of America.

(2) Geetanjali Tahilramani, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abebe Tiruneh Boled, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

(2) Amjad Iqbal Burq, Islam Medical College, Pakistan.

(3) Jyotsna Pandit Khedkar, NES’s Gangamai College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) L.P. Himali, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

(5) Mayda Losada Robaina, University of Sciences of Physical Culture and Sports “Manuel Fajardo”, Cuba.

(6) Mohammad Pirhayati, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Paul Goh Sczepaniak, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geetanjali Tahilramani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA