Peer Review History: Association between the Demographic Factors, Dyslipidemia and Frequency of Blood Donation among Blood Donors in Ibadan, Oyo States, Nigeria.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunying Li, Georgia State University, USA.

(2) Dr. Enrico Sanjust, University of Cagliari, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Theressia Handayani, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(2) Kumlachew Mergiaw Abtew, Sebre Berhan University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Theressia Handayani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kumlachew Mergiaw Abtew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF INFANT FORMULA BASED ON DELIPIDIZED CORN FLOUR AND PUMPKIN SEEDS (Citrullus lanatus) IN GROWING WISTAR RATS (Rattus norvegicus)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kristina Mastanjevic, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Paulina O. Adeniyi, Lead City University, Nigeria.

(2) Rinto M. Nur, Universitas Pasifik Morotai, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paulina O. Adeniyi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rinto M. Nur, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Host-Specific Gut Microbiomes in Three Estuarine Crabs

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A. Vijaya Anand, Bharathiar University Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chinwe Justice-Alucho, Clemson University, United States.

(2) Srishti Chandra, Barkatullah University, India .

(3) Feranmi Obe, University of Texas at Tyler, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hope Akegbe, University of Notre Dame, United States of America.

(2) Ibrahim m. s.shnawa, AL-Qasim Green University and University of Hilla, Iraq.

(3) Miriam Amarachi Mike, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USA.

(4) Omar Abdullah Al-Hashimi, Open Educational College, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chinwe Justice-Alucho, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srishti Chandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Feranmi Obe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Deep Learning in Food Processing and Production: Trends, Innovations and Future Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Narendra Chennupati, USA.

(2) Olena Liashenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kohinur Begum, State University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narendra Chennupati, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olena Liashenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship Between Apolipoproteins and Hypertension: Insights into the Pathophysiology of Hypertensive Disease

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Kashmira J. Gohil, Sharda Group of Institutions (SGI), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharodiya Das, India.

(2) Harshilkumar J. Shah, India.

(3) Anjum Ilahi, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Balaji P.A, Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences, Sakaria Hospital, India.

(2) Ravi Babu Surisetti, Andhra University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharodiya Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harshilkumar J. Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anjum Ilahi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Aphid, Lipaphis pseudobrassicae (Davis) Infesting Broccoli

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monier Morad Wahba, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Parthasarathy, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, India.

(2) A. Nithish, SKLTGHU, India.

(3) Bui Tuan Viet, Vietnam .

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kashif Kamran, University of Balochistan Quetta, Pakistan.

(2) Rosane de Oliveira Nunes Carvalho, Universidade Federaldo Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

(3) Sandeep V, India.

(4) Sunil Aryal, Nepal.

(5) Theodore Munyuli, DRCongo.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Parthasarathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Nithish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bui Tuan Viet, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Errors Related to the Concept of Derivative among 3rd-year Science Students in Goma, DR Congo

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xingting Wang, Louisiana State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Syrenzo R. Sicuan, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

(2) Ebenezer Agudey Akuteye, Regentropfen University College, Ghana.

(3) Olujide Dixon, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bashir Idris, Federal College of Education (Technical) Gusau, Nigeria.

(2) Rofiat Adewumi Aderinoye-Rabiu, Federal University of Health Sciences, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syrenzo R. Sicuan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ebenezer Agudey Akuteye, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Olujide Dixon, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Linking Professional Development to Teacher and Pupil Performance: Evidence from Two Schools in Kabugao District 2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Naorem Ingochouba Singh, Ibotombi Institute of Education, Canchipur, India.

(2) Haleema Bibi, University of Haripur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bikram Biswas, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Francis Moodu Yakubu, University of Alabama, Nigeria.

(3) Freda Asante, Ohio University, United States.

(4) Sebastian Uwem Essien, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naorem Ingochouba Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haleema Bibi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Bonding Performance at the Interface between New and Old Concrete

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Carlos Humberto Martins, State University of Maringá, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Siba Prasad Mishra, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hyginus Obinna Ozioko, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture,Nigeria.

(2) Hasanain Saleh Jassam ( Hasanain S. AL Tamemi ), Ministry of Education, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kamalesh Kumar, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, India.

(2) Viktoriia Rubel, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hyginus Obinna Ozioko, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hasanain Saleh Jassam (Hasanain S. AL Tamemi ), Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Restoring the Soil and Sustaining the Future: A Global Review of Natural Farming Practices and Impacts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) N N Singh, India.

(2) N. Senthilkumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), India.

(3) Pushpanjali Singh, School of Management Sciences, Lucknow, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranojit Kumar Dutta, City University, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N N Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Senthilkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pushpanjali Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA