Peer Review History: Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms and Tax Compliance: The Moderating Role of Taxpayer Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sahibpreet Singh, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Lam Weng Hoe, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

(3) Lam Weng Hoe, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alebel Woretaw Asaye, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

(2) Sazir Nsubuga Mayanja, Islamic Call University, Uganda.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sahibpreet Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lam Weng Hoe, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Desta Temotewos Tumoro, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Understanding Soil Microbial Diversity and Its Role in Ecosystem Functioning: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Harish Kumar T. S, D. R. M. Science College, India.

(2) Swati P. Deshmukh, Ramnarain Ruia Autonomous College, India.

(3) Seethiya Mahajan, Khalsa University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Işılay LAVKOR, Biological Control Research Institute, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harish Kumar T. S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swati P. Deshmukh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seethiya Mahajan, Indi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Constraints in the Performance of Panchayat Leaders in Navsari District of South Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitesti University Center, Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Das, SRI SRI University, India.

(2) Anindita Bhattacharya, United Kingdom.

(3) Guwani Erangi Kavirathna, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Neena Brar, Shaheed Bhai Mani Singh Khalsa College, India.

(2) P.Gurusamy, Bharathiar Unviersity, Idnia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.26/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anindita Bhattacharya, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guwani Erangi Kavirathna, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Assessment and Profitability Analysis of Wheat Cultivation in Gwalior District, Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Riweu Kenye, ST. Joseph’s College, India.

(2) Deokate Pallavi Sudhir, Dr. Sharadchandra Pawar College of Agriculture, India.

(3) Rahul Kumar Rai, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Babloo Jakhar, Central University of Odisha, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Riweu Kenye, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deokate Pallavi Sudhir, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rahul Kumar Rai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation and Characterization of Azotobacter and Potash Solubilizing Bacteria Isolates from Rhizospheric Soil of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) Growing Areas of Kolhapur District, Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Omar Abdullah Al-Hashimi, Open Educational College, Iraq.

(2) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Maaty, Egypt.

(2) Shobha Ramaswamy, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education ( Deemed to be University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omar Abdullah Al-Hashimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Educational Programs in Preventing Vesicovaginal Fistula Recurrence in Northern Nigerian Women: A Community-Based Randomised Controlled Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamalpreet Kaur, Baba Farid University Of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Hansa Dhar, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akhaine Jesuoboh Precious, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamalpreet Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hansa Dhar, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Access to Sunscreen, Protective Clothing, and Dermatologic Care Among Albino Populations in Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Chadi Khatib, Manara University, Syria.

(2) Mutaz Sabah Ahmeid, Ibn Sina University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arman Abdous, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chadi Khatib, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mutaz Sabah Ahmeid, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing Pediatric Emergency Department Return Visits in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil Magiorkinis, Metaxas Memorial Anticancer Hospital, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Haseeb Ahmad, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(2) Kaival Malav Shah, Smt. B. K. Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajit Kumar, India.

(2) Amna Jawaid, Australia.

(3) Hardik Suthar PT, College of Physiotherapy, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth an Institution Deemed to be University, India.

(4) Hendy Lesmana, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Indonesia.

(5) Shaghayegh Rahmani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haseeb Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kaival Malav Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: DEA-based Comparison of Seed and Grain Production Efficiency of JAKI-9218 Variety of Chickpea in Amravati District of Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Niam A.Fawaz, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Sanjivani Srivastava, Gokhale Institute of Politics & Economics, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranjan B. Yedatkar, Swami Ramanad Teerth Marathwada University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niam A.Fawaz, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjivani Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Blockchain and Big Data Analytics in Agriculture: A Review of Digital Innovations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China..

Reviewers:

(1) Oyedapo Olufemi Oyeleke, Tai Solarin University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Lochumi Kikon, Nagaland University, India.

(3) S. Sriramajayam, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mukti Nath Jha, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oyedapo Olufemi Oyeleke, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lochumi Kikon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Sriramajayam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA