Peer Review History: Evaluating the Antibacterial Activity of Transition Metal Complexes Derived from 4(4-sulpophenylazo) Pyrogall

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. S. M. Abe Kawsar, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkatesh K Bhovi, Vijayanagar College, India.

(2) K. E. Ajibulu, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education Science and Technology IKERE, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.KARPAGAM, St. Michael College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(2) Chandan Kumar, Deoghar College, (S.K.M. University), India.

(3) Dhondiram Tukaram Sakhare, Shivaji Art’s, Comm. & Science College Kannad, India.

(4) Paul Metilda, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, Manonmanium Sundranar University, India.

(5) Rahul Kanaoujiya, K.P. Uccha Shiksha Sansthan, Rajendra Singh(Rajju Bhaiya) University Prayagraj, India.

(6) Samaila Abubakar, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkatesh K Bhovi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. E. Ajibulu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Incidental Findings During Abdominal Surgery Clinical Significance and Ethical Consideration: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alfredo Chama Naranjo, Universidad Popular Autonoma del Estado de Puebla, Mexico.

(2) Zainab Sahib A. Quraish, Al Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alfredo Chama Naranjo, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zainab Sahib A. Quraish, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Composition and Phytochemical Characterization of Daccryodes edulis (African Pear) Ethanol Stem Bark Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Essien Kemfon Friday, Bayero University, Nigeria.

(2) Priya Patel, Saurashtra University, India.

(3) Bharadhan Bose, Sree Abirami College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Essien Kemfon Friday, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priya Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bharadhan Bose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Limberg Flap Cover for Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: Experience from a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital in North Kashmir, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil Magiorkinis, Metaxas Memorial Anticancer Hospital, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamed Humayid Mohammed Al-Aamri, Ibra Hospital, Oman.

(2) Uthamalingam Murali, Manipal University College, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hamed Humayid Mohammed Al-Aamri, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Uthamalingam Murali, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Evaluation of Anthelmintic Potential of Aqueous and Ethanolic Leaf Extracts of Vitex negundo in Benzimidazole-resistant Haemonchus contortus of Sheep

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Gupta, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

(2) David Omagbe OSHADU, University of Jos, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Melina Seyfried, Brazil.

(2) Relwendé Justin Ouédraogo, Burkina Faso.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Omagbe OSHADU, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial inoculants for growth and quality enhancement of medicinal and aromatic plants

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers: 

(1) Sanja Predrag Zivkovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(2) Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, BAMU, India.

(3) Tariq Zaman, University of Science & Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayat Shanshol Al-Yasssiry, Science College, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(2) Sweta Subhashree Jena, College Of Agriculture, Orissa University Of Agriculture And Technology, India.

(3) Talha Riaz, Huazhong Agricultural University, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanja Predrag Zivkovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tariq Zaman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hypomagnesemia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Correlation with Glycemic Control and Microvascular Complications

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna Chaudhari, MIMER Medical College, India.

(2) Eugenie Anago, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shafat Karim, GOVT. Tibbi College & Hospital, India.

(2) Mustafa Balevi, Konya Şehir Hastanesi, Türkiye.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparna Chaudhari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eugenie Anago, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Effects of Currency Volatility on Language Education Programmes in Nigeria: Implementation and Sustainability Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jomel B. Manuel, Cagayan State University, Philippines.

(2) Ahmadreza Mohebbi, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Heny Sulistyowati, University of PGRI Jombang, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jomel B. Manuel, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmadreza Mohebbi, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Poultry Litter Compost: An Effective Organic Fertilizer for Enhancing Growth and Fruit Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Prof. Serdar DUSEN, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) A. D.  Lanki, College of Agriculture Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Ozanildo Vilaça do Nascimento, Federal University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(3) Muhammad Waqar Nasir, Yangzhou University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. D.  Lanki, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ozanildo Vilaça do Nascimento, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Waqar Nasir, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Length-Weight Relationship and Natural Diet of Hemichromis fasciatus, Coptodon zillii and Pelmatolapia mariae in Akomoje Water Reservoir, Abeokuta, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Telat Yanik, Atatürk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mve Beh Jean Herve, Institut De Recherche Agronomiques Et Forestiere , Gabon.

(2) Fatema Tuj Juhra, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.

(3) Julio César Marín Leal, Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, Tamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(2) Seher Dirican, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

(3) Arezoo Vahabnezhad, Iran.

(4) Rekha Mahato, ICFRE-Rain Forest Research Institute, India.

(5) Sushil Bera, Khejuri College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mve Beh Jean Herve, Gabon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatema Tuj Juhra, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Julio César Marín Leal, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA