Peer Review History: Spatial Analysis of Nutritional and Health Inequalities Among Adolescents in Kumbakonam Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Nedim Özdemir, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Willy Deivson Leandro Da Silva, Brasil.

(2) Bedjo Utomo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Willy Deivson Leandro Da Silva, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bedjo Utomo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Combined Effects of Acute Restraint Stress and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Deprivation on Renal Inflammation in Female Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kashi Nath Sarkar, Raipur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.

(2) Jyothsna Devi Kuchipudi, JAIN Deemed-to-be-University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Lakshmi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kashi Nath Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyothsna Devi Kuchipudi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unlocking the Potential of Collaborative Digital Tools: Key Factors Influencing Their Usage among Workers in the Ghanaian Construction Industry

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Arabshahi, Iran.

(2) Ahmed Falah Hasan, University of Kufa, Iraq.

(3) Abdullah Isa Adam, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) AYODELE Oluwole Alejo, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

(2) Gideon Abayomi Oloyede, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(3) James Thoengsal, University of Technology Sulawesi, Indonesia.

(4) Mayowa Adedapo Ogungbe, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

(5) Saroj Nayyar, Kalinga University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alireza Arabshahi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Falah Hasan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdullah Isa Adam, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Probiotic Levels Through Water Supplementation on Broiler Performance Under Heat Stress Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shakeeb Ullah, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Agung Adi Candra, Politeknik Negeri Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ammar Mahmoud Mostafa, Lattakia University, Syria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shakeeb Ullah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agung Adi Candra, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparing ATI, CCT and SCM in Power BI for performance and applications: an analytical approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamarulzaman Ab. Aziz, Multimedia University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukta Agarwal, Indus University, India.

(2) R Sugumar, Bharathidasan University, India.

(3) Andrea Piroddi, Italy.

(4) Nithyanandh Selvam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Rajeshkumar, Arignar Anna Government Arts College Namakkal, India.

(2) Suman Garai, KiiT Deemed-to-be-University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukta Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Sugumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Andrea Piroddi, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nithyanandh Selvam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Extent of Farmer Participation in the Tribal Sub Plan in Udham Singh Nagar District of Uttarakhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Pal, CUP, Punjab, India.

(2) Tahir Saleem, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aparana Sharma, JNKVV- College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Priyam Agravat, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tahir Saleem, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Use of Mechanical Transplanters and Manual Transplanting for Paddy Cultivation in Thiruvananthapuram District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, Annasaheb Dange College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Afokhainu Segun Agbadua, National Engineering Design Development Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Afokhainu Segun Agbadua, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 (No Response) | NA | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Automatic Family Drip System (FDS) to Boost Urban Vegetable Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Miguel Armando López Beltrán, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, México.

(2) Arvind Singh Tomar, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(3) Ashok Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India.

(4) Anayatullah Nayaji, Ch.B.P.Government Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Norhafzan Binti Bariman, Politeknik Muadzam Shah, Malaysia.

(3) Sushmita M Dadhich, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

(4) V.N.Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Miguel Armando López Beltrán, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arvind Singh Tomar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashok Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Anayatullah Nayaji, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eco-friendly Plant Disease Management Using Spent Mushroom Substrate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Vijayalakshmi, Sri Sarada College For Women (Autonomous), India.

(2) Moses Mutetwa, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sukhpal Kaur, Desh Bhagat dental College & Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moses Mutetwa, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Detection of Pvl and MecA Gene in Cefoxitin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Emergency Units of Selected Hospitals in Abuja Municipal Area, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Idress Hamad Attitalla, Dean of Faculty of Medical Technology El-Beida, Faculty of Science, Department of Microbiology, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahra Keshtmand, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Taudgirdas Persaud, Texila American University Guyana, Guyana.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahra Keshtmand, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Taudgirdas Persaud, Guyana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA