Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujay Hurali, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Fawad Khan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujay Hurali, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fawad Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Concordia, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreshtha Gaur, Banasthali University, India.

(2) Kanamala Arun Chand Roby, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India.

(3) Jyoti Trivedi, Autonomous State Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shreshtha Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanamala Arun Chand Roby, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jyoti Trivedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Mustaquim, Aliah University, India.

(2) Thudugalage Don Chaminda Pushpakumara, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Mustaquim, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thudugalage Don Chaminda Pushpakumara, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Ikapel Omete, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Prakash Pinto, St Joseph Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Ikapel Omete, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prakash Pinto, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sitki Selim Dolanay, Turkiye.

(2) Ifeanyi O. Nwanna, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sitki Selim Dolanay, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ifeanyi O. Nwanna, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurav Nurhari Lanjewar, Dr. B.S.K.K.V, India.

(2) Sanee Chauhan, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurav Nurhari Lanjewar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanee Chauhan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Oğuz Dolgun, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rekhashree Kalita, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anil Kumar, Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rekhashree Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akanksha Yadav, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tercentenary University, India.

(2) Oyinloye Olaitan Daniel, Federal Polytechnic Ede, Nigeria.

(3) Shella B Cacatian, Cagayan State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akanksha Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oyinloye Olaitan Daniel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shella B Cacatian, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Munnir Mukhtar Getso, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

(2) Pramod Prabhakar, BAU, Sabour, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Munnir Mukhtar Getso, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pramod Prabhakar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhanu Murthy K C, Dr Y.S.R Horticultural University, India.

(2) Plamen Ivanov, Fruit Growing Institute, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhanu Murthy K C, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Plamen Ivanov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA