Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ram Kumar Solanki, Sandip University, India.

(2) Afshan Bhutto, Govt. Girls Degree College, Pakistan.

(3) M. Rathi, Dr. NGP Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ram Kumar Solanki, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Afshan Bhutto, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Rathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhilasha Choudhary, SBRM Govt College Nagaur, India.

(2) Khushbu Bhirud, St. Lawrence High School and Junior College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhilasha Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khushbu Bhirud, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prakashkumar H. Patel, Neotech College of Applied Science & Research, Shri Govind Guru University, India.

(2) Reza Chaharpashlou, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prakashkumar H. Patel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reza Chaharpashlou, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. S. Venkatesan, All India Institute of Speech & Hearing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Saleh Nuhu, Northwest University, Nigeria.

(2) Wasan Abdulmunem Taha, Samarra University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saleh Nuhu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wasan Abdulmunem Taha, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Adegbanke, Omolara Racheal, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Majid Majeed, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adegbanke, Omolara Racheal, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Majid Majeed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fahim Jan, Qurtuba University of Science and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Muhamad Risal Tawil, Indonesia.

(3) Sindu Bharath, JSS Science and Technology University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fahim Jan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhamad Risal Tawil, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sindu Bharath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rohitashv Nagar, Career Point University, Kota (Rajasthan), India.

(2) Yogesh Shaniware, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India.

(3) Venkatesan V G, India.

(4) Sri Maryani ST, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rohitashv Nagar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Shaniware, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Venkatesan V G, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sri Maryani ST, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Pragyan Parimita Nayak, Kalinga College of Commerce, India.

(2) Ogundipe Olorunshogo Benjamin, Redeemer’s University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pragyan Parimita Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ogundipe Olorunshogo Benjamin, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Aondover Shaahu, National Cereals Research Institute, Nigeria.

(2) D. Bhadru, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aondover Shaahu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Bhadru, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Narendra Ande, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

(2) Rashmi Rekha Saikia, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(3) Milkesa Feyera Tujoo, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sagar Narendra Ande, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rashmi Rekha Saikia, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Milkesa Feyera Tujoo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA