Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pietro Scicchitano, Hospital “F. Perinei” Altamura (Ba), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Susmita Chakrabarty, DRIEMS University, India.

(2) Shubham Singh, Rai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susmita Chakrabarty, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Fattma A. Ali, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

(2) Nabaa Adnan Mohammed, University of Fallujah, Iraq.

(3) M. Ranga Priya, The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Excel College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fattma A. Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabaa Adnan Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M. Ranga Priya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dominic Aondowase Ioryue, Nigeria.

(2) Shifadjzic Khan, Kyungpook National University, South Korea.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dominic Aondowase Ioryue, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shifadjzic Khan, South Korea) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Kristina Mastanjevic, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Garima Kumari, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Ravishankar Suryanarayana, SDUAHER, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Garima Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravishankar Suryanarayana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississippi Medical Center, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajni Dubey, People’s University, India.

(2) Amulya Dakka, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajni Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amulya Dakka, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Saranya, Cauvery College for Women (Autonomous), India.

(2) Elayaraja Aruchunan, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Saranya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elayaraja Aruchunan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação And Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumya Ranjan Das, Alaka Mahavidyalaya, Odisha, India.

(2) Ronika Yousuf, Vishwa Bharati Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumya Ranjan Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ronika Yousuf, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Honey Jajo, Himalayan Pharmacy Institute, India.

(2) Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Amaechi Dennis, Veritas University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Honey Jajo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amaechi Dennis, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S., All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

(2) Dr. Giou-Teng, Yiang, Tzu Chi University,  Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Pichandy Muthuprasanna, Surya College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Shreeshail Tumbagi, India.

(3) Prashant Purohit, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pichandy Muthuprasanna, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shreeshail Tumbagi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prashant Purohit, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Sateesh Kumar Deevi, K L deemed to be University, India.

(2) Papadatu Carmen-Penelopi, “Dunarea de Jos” University from Galati, Romania.

(3) Aziz Arbai, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sateesh Kumar Deevi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Papadatu Carmen-Penelopi, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aziz Arbai, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA