Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

(2) Dr. A. Magesh, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Dumbuya, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

(2) Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Blessing Eluowa, University Of Delta, Nigeria.

(2) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(3) Dodi Isran, STIES Nahdlatul Ulama Bengkulu, Indonesia.

(4) M R Ramesh. Indira Gandhi centre For Atomic Research, India.

(5) Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Dumbuya, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Rafiq-uz-Zaman, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Choon Wah Yuen, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Orueri Daniel Ufuoma, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria.

(2) Abu Sayem Khan, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

(3) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zeeshan Ullah, NUST Islamabad, Pakistan.

(2) Aminul Islam, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Orueri Daniel Ufuoma, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abu Sayem Khan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sandeep Bhardwaj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Afroz Naeem Khan, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Sunil Balu Avhad, Annasaheb Vartak College, University of Mumbai, India.

(3) Teba Saadi Hussein, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Afroz Naeem Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunil Balu Avhad, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Teba Saadi Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Manish A. Kamble, RTMNU, India.

(2) Hashim Khan, Metro College of Health Sciences & Research, India.

(3) Meraj Meraj, Hakim Syed Ziaul Hasan Government Unani Medical College & Hospital, India.

(4) Soumi Chattopadhyay, Vidyasagar Pharmaceutical College Of Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manish A. Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hashim Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meraj Meraj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Soumi Chattopadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Valliammal, Rajalakshmi Engineering College (Retd.), India.

(2) Mohammed Hezam Al-Mashreki, Yemen.

(3) Vanishri R Hundekar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Valliammal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Hezam Al-Mashreki, Yemen) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vanishri R Hundekar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s): 

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Teklu Gebretsadik Wana, University of Aveiro, Portugal.

(2) Gede Sedana, Dwijendra University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anyiam Kelechi Henry, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Teklu Gebretsadik Wana, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gede Sedana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Meenakhi Prust, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Roghan H B, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meenakhi Prust, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roghan H B, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Sri Endang Agustina Rahayuningsih, University of Palangka Raya, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sri Endang Agustina Rahayuningsih, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Nebiha Metoui, Tunisia.

(2) Tara Devi Sen, Vallabh Government College Mandi. HP, India.

(3) Swatantra Yadav, CSAUA&T, Kanpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nebiha Metoui, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tara Devi Sen, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Swatantra Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) H. R. Raghuvanshi, Career Point University, India.

(2) Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, India.

(3) A. Karmel Reetha, PAJANCOA & RI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (H. R. Raghuvanshi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandan Kumar Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. Karmel Reetha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA