Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pankaj Bora, Bahona College, India.

(2) Ashik Faysal, North South University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pankaj Bora, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashik Faysal, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David E. Martin, USA.

(2) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Wahab, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) M. VINOTH KUMAR, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Wahab, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. VINOTH KUMAR, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghulam Abbas, Riphah International University Lahore, Pakistan.

(2) Suraphon Chaiwongsar, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna Lampang, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghulam Abbas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suraphon Chaiwongsar, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Iryna Patseva, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Ukraine.

(2) Mbemba Kiele Molingo, University of Marien Ngouabi, Republic of Congo.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Iryna Patseva, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mbemba Kiele Molingo, Republic of Congo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vijay Sharma, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Desta Fekadu Mijena, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vijay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Desta Fekadu Mijena, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Srinivasa Rao, Malla Reddy University, India.

(2) Mohanapriya.G, Kgisl Institute Of Technology, India.

(3) Gizachew Diga Milki, Jimma University, college of Natural science, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srinivasa Rao, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohanapriya.G, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gizachew Diga Milki, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Felipe Kremer Ribeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

(2) Dakshayini R Patil, BMS College of Architecture, Design and Planning, Bangalore (Formerly, BMS College of Architecture), India.

(3) Tikendra Kumar Sahu, Apeejay Stya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Felipe Kremer Ribeiro, Brasil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dakshayini R Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tikendra Kumar Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. A. Magesh, Sri Sai Ram Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepika K Singh, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, India.

(2) Diego Bernaschina, Chile.

(3) Maria Jiji P. Paires, CEBU Technological University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepika K Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diego Bernaschina, Chile) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maria Jiji P. Paires, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Fábio da Costa Henry, University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Rafaela Jardim Bonet, Universidade Federal do Parana, Brazil.

(2) Laxmi, Kerala Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rafaela Jardim Bonet, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Laxmi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Sarkar, Moridhal College, India.

(2) Samira Malekzadeh Shiravani, Azad University, Iran.

(3) Afshan Abbas, Sir Syed College of Medical Sciences for girls, Pakistan.

(4) Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashish Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samira Malekzadeh Shiravani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Afshan Abbas, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA