Peer Review History: In vitro Growth of Alternaria alternata Isolated from Strawberry under Constant Light or Constant Darkness Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Samir Pratap Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Farshid Talat, AREEO, Iran.

(3) Alaa Hassan Radhi, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alaa Hassan Radhi, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Anisii Anisievich Alekseev, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.

(3) MohammadHossein Karami, University of Isfahan, Iran.

(4) Ranjan kumar Jena, ICAR- National Rice Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samir Pratap Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farshid Talat, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alaa Hassan Radhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic diversity studies using D2 statistics in Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) Genotypes for Agro-Morphological and Biochemical Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalpana K, Osmania University, India.

(2) P.Sivakumar, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Muhammad Atif Wahid, Central Cotton Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farshid Talat, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kalpana K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P.Sivakumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Atif Wahid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Breeding Approaches for Genetic Improvement in Banana: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Abiodun Temitope Oyelere, United States.

(2) Niranjan Chinara, India.

(3) Mileide dos Santos Ferreira, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abiodun Temitope Oyelere, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niranjan Chinara, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mileide dos Santos Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Soil Pollution Caused by Wastewater from the Truck Gauging Process: A Case Study from the Bureau of Mines and Geology (BUMIGEB), Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey  Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Idham Ali Abed, University Of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) Aysha Be, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(3) KANDARPA PHUKAN, HANDIQUE GIRLS’ COLLGE, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bharathi Prakash, Mangalore University, India.

(2) Ana Letícia Araszewski Gomes da Silva, Federal University of Technology, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Idham Ali Abed, Iraq) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aysha Be, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (KANDARPA PHUKAN, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Options for Effective Forest Management of the Oak Wilt Fungus (Bretziella fagacearum) in the Eastern United States

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Manjari, ICAR- Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, India.

(2) Shilpa Sood, MCM DAV College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhritiman Chanda, University of Science and Technology Meghalaya, India.

(2) Makhabbah Jamilatun, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manjari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shilpa Sood, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Psychological Predictors of Stress and Anxiety among Youths in South East Nigeria: The Role of Art Education and Creative Expression

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh M S, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Akhila K P, Acharya Institute of Graduate Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Audifax Kpeno, Institute of Medical Sciences & SUM Hospital, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be university), India.

(2) Kavita Gupta, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India.

(3) Otieno Edwine Jeremiah, Multimedia University of Kenya, Kenya.

(4) Shahzeb Danish, Institute of Social and Cultural Studies, University of the Punjab Lahore, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogesh M S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akhila K P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Relation to Lipid Profile and Atherogenic Indices in Adult Males in Abuja

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Hakeem Temitope Adekunle, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Indunil Karunarathna, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anindya Dasgupta, Jhargram Govt Medical College, Jhargram under The West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hakeem Temitope Adekunle, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indunil Karunarathna, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of genetic variability for grain yield and its contributing traits in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pierre A. Raoufou Radji, Université du Lomé, Togo.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Jain, Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), India.

(2) Dhrumil Parsotambhai Patel, Marwadi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.B.M.Sirisha, ANGRAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhrumil Parsotambhai Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation of Plastic Degrading Microorganisms from Clifford University Dumpsites

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Bani Waleed University, Libya.

(2) Igoni Yirabari Gote, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P Kavitha, Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies, India

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osama Asanousi Eshteiwi Lamma, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Igoni Yirabari Gote, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of Linear Anthropometric Parameters in Estimating Stature: A Study of Adult Igbo Population in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) N Sandhya, Garden City University, India.

(2) Pratik Khona, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Haritma Nigam, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N Sandhya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratik Khona, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Haritma Nigam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA