Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Antifungal Chitinase Activity of Bacillus mycoides Isolated from the Ancient Ruins of the Red Mosque

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nisreen Jawad Kadhim, University Warith ALanbiyaa, Iraq.

(2) Fatemeh Poureini, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Iran.

(3) Rukaibaa Ali Chechan, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nisreen Jawad Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatemeh Poureini, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rukaibaa Ali Chechan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Role of Small Millets in Assam’s Agrifood System, India: A Comparative Analysis with Major Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Prof. (Dr.) Ismail Seven, University of Firat, TURKEY.

Reviewers:

(1) Mekala Mounika, India.

(2) Gabriel Diniz Faleiros, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Kundu, Sripat Singh College (Under University of Kalyani), India.

(2) Changamayum Girija Devi, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management, India.

(3) Darade Rustum Hanumant, Samarth College of Engineering and Management, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(4) Shehrooz Afzal, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mekala Mounika, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gabriel Diniz Faleiros, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Relationship between Yield and Yield Components of Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L. var. hortense) by Correlation and Path Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ilea Marioara, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Vasiljka Karacic, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ilea Marioara, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vasiljka Karacic, Serbia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of a Cow Dung Dewatering Machine for Small Farms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Saif Ali Kadhim, University of Technology- Iraq, Iraq.

(2) Shifadjzic Khan, Kyungpook National University, South Korea.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afokhainu Segun Agbbadua, National Engineering Design Development Institute, Nigeria.

(2) Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, Annasaheb Dange College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saif Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shifadjzic Khan, South Korea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Sediment Deposition Rates in Orashi River, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Essam Fathy Mohamed El-Hashash, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ogbonna, Vincent Anaboro, South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Aminu Mustapha, Bayero University, Nigeria.

(3) Stanislav Dushkin, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Okeh, Nigeria.

(2) Jakkapan  Potipat, Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University, Thailand.

(3) Suraj Kalgonda Patil, DKTEs Textile & Engineering Institute, India.

(4) Toderas Mihaela, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ogbonna, Vincent Anaboro, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aminu Mustapha, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Stanislav Dushkin, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Revisiting Endodontic Protocols in the Wake of COVID-19: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, MuglaSitkiKocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sundus Shabir, Pakistan.

(2) Banan A. Almashali, King Abdullah University Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Lucrezia Parma Benfenati, University of Michigan, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Erni Puspanantasari Putri, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sundus Shabir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Banan A. Almashali, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lucrezia Parma Benfenati, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Method and Seed Rate on Growth and Yield of Carrot (Daucus carota L.) in the River Nile State, Sudan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan , Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Masoumeh Asadi Aghbolaghi, University of Tehran, Iran.

(2) Udit Joshi, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ihab N. Al-Abasi, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Masoumeh Asadi Aghbolaghi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udit Joshi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, and Cytotoxicity Properties of Five Medicinal Plants Used by Traditional Healers in Burkina Faso: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Rajeev College of Pharmacy, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharmeen Mohd Anis Shaikh , Siddhi’s Institute of pharmacy , India.

(2) Gama Mohan M G, India.

(3) Le Quang Ung, Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry, Vietnam.

(4) Kiruthika Balasubramanian, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.27/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharmeen Mohd Anis Shaikh , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gama Mohan M G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Le Quang Ung, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kiruthika Balasubramanian, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Postpartum Anxiety and Depression among Postpartum Mothers: A Study at Postnatal Clinics in Enugu and Delta States, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Susanti Niman, Institut Kesehatan Immanuel, Indonesia.

(2) Madhusmita Nayak, Siksha O Anusandhan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Susanti Niman, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhusmita Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Impact of Zambia’s Food Fortification Programs on the Nutritional Status of under-Five Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kashamma V Uppin, KAHER, India.

(2) Luu Thi My Thuc, National Children,s Hospital, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kashamma V Uppin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luu Thi My Thuc, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA