Editor(s):

(1) Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, Pasteur Institute of Iran, IRAN.

Reviewers:

(1) Almou Abdoulaye Alio, University Abdou Moumouni, Niger.

(2) Vinay G M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Almou Abdoulaye Alio, Niger) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay G M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Driouche Youssouf, Algeria.

(2) Dimitra Kaffe, University of Thessaly, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Driouche Youssouf, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dimitra Kaffe, Greece) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Gamal Sallam, Agricultural and Biology Research Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Engy Mahmoud Mohamed Mahmoud, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Gamal Sallam, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Engy Mahmoud Mohamed Mahmoud, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jegathambigai Rameshwar Naidu, Science University (MSU), Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ritu Adhana, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Venkata Satyanarayana Nanduri, India.

(3) Reem Mohammed Obaid, University of Baghdad / College of Science For Women, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ritu Adhana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Venkata Satyanarayana Nanduri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Reem Mohammed Obaid, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Naresh Rambhau Dahegaonkar, Gondwana University, India.

(2) Muhammad Jahangeer, University of Okara, Pakistan.

(3) Arshad Ali, University of Malakand, Pakistan.

(4) Manju Hajarilal Pardeshi, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University Amravati, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naresh Rambhau Dahegaonkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Jahangeer, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arshad Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Manju Hajarilal Pardeshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

(2) Dr. Giou-Teng Yiang, Tzu Chi University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Huda Mohamed Ali Rasheed, British University in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Edi Purnomo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Huda Mohamed Ali Rasheed, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Edi Purnomo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Scope Global Skills University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakibul Hasan Chowdhury, International Institute of Business Analysis, USA.

(2) Mohammad Haroon, Integral University, India.

(3) Saaransh Choudhary, Rajasthan Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakibul Hasan Chowdhury, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Haroon, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saaransh Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Suyash Sawale, Smt. C.H.M College, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Sabina Khatun, Mankar Institute of Education and Research of Pharmacy Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suyash Sawale, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sabina Khatun, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Nedim Özdemir, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ngangbam Romeji Singh, National Institute of Technology Manipur, India.

(2) Aruna Rani, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ngangbam Romeji Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aruna Rani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Manisha Gupta, SGRRIM&HS, India.

(2) Kalaiselvi.G, Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Norzarina Binti Othman, University Technology Of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manisha Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kalaiselvi.G, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Norzarina Binti Othman, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA