Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Study on Consumer Awareness, Buying Behaviour and Satisfaction Levels of Sugam Ice Cream in Vadodara City

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) John Paul G. Buenaventura, College of Tourism and Hospitality Management, National University, Philippines.

(2) Manish Kumar Srivastava, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, India.

(3) Renil Septiano, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi KBP, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Paul G. Buenaventura, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Renil Septiano, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development Communication of Kotaku Program in Completing Slums in Cilegon City

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Jigar Rupani, Christ University, India.

(2) Preeti Sehgal Chawla, India.

(3) Meinrad Haule Lembuka, The Open University of Tanzania, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Yadav, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University Madhya Pradesh, India.

(2) Taiwo Justice Olorunlana, Lamar University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jigar Rupani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Preeti Sehgal Chawla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meinrad Haule Lembuka, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional aspects of pollen diets and evaluation of the acceptance of pollen diets by honey bees

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipak Khanal, Texas A&M University, Nepal.

(2) Swapna S, SN College for Women, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Swarnali Bhattacharya, Visva-Bharati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Matangi Mishra, LPU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dipak Khanal, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swapna S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Swarnali Bhattacharya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Orchard to Opportunity: Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Mango Growers in Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Siti Sri Wulandari, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia.

(2) John Atsu Agbolosoo, Institute Pertanian Bogor (IPB) University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.Meena, Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Alex Duenas Pena, Universidad Mayor de Cundinamarca, Colombia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siti Sri Wulandari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (John Atsu Agbolosoo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Socio Economic Profile and Constraints Faced by the Banana Growers in Theni District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunali Mahajan, SKUAST, India.

(2) Rahul Kumar, Aaryvarth Institute of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunali Mahajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahul Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Impact of Key Factors and Their Interactions on Process Outcomes in Experimental Optimization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudheer Devaraju, University of Houston Texas, USA.

(2) Swetha. N, Madras University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asnakew Sewale Belay, University of Gondar, Institute of Technology, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudheer Devaraju, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swetha. N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Plant defense mechanisms against plant parasitic nematodes

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunil Balu Avhad, Annasaheb Vartak college of Arts, Kedarnath Malhotra College of Commerce, E.S. Andrades College of Science, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) S. Prabhu, Tamil Nadu Agricultural Univeristy, India.

(3) Bikkasani Mythri, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anukiran Sahu, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Seema Tripathy, Sri Sri University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunil Balu Avhad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Prabhu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bikkasani Mythri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic diversity and variability analysis for yield and its components in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Amelio Morales Morales, Universidad Juarez Autonoma de Tabasco, Mexico.

(2) Dogo Doosuur Mary, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi Benue State, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Pratap Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amelio Morales Morales, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dogo Doosuur Mary, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advances in Migraine Therapy: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anjaneyulu Vinukonda, Strides Pharma Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashidat Oluwabukola Owolabi, Emirates College of Health Sciences and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Moaz Abouelmagd, Cairo University, Egypt.

(3) Zhihui Wang, University of Rochester, USA.

(4) Deepak Kajla, Gurugram Global College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.98/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashidat Oluwabukola Owolabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moaz Abouelmagd, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zhihui Wang, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Deepak Kajla, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clueless Eyes in Intracranial Hypotension: A Case Report of Reverse INO

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. S. Venkatesan, All India Institute of Speech & Hearing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vikas Chauhan, University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.

(2) Sangeeta Gupta, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sangeeta Gupta, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vikas Chauhan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sangeeta Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA