Peer Review History: Misdiagnosed Recurrent Nodular Lesions of the Hand: A Case of Neurofibroma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Patnala Mohan Patro, GITAM Deemed to be  University, Visakhapatnam, AP, India

Reviewers:

(1) Saransh Gupta, India.

(2) Sadeq Qanah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Grant M. Pham, ExpertDerm Dermatology Fellowship, USA.

(2) Matteo Bonetti, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Italy.

(3) Lukas Rasulić, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade Clinic for Neurosurgery, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Serbia.

(4) Ronaldo Abreu, UNINCOR, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saransh Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadeq Qanah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: A Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Databases

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohd Zuber, Scope Global Skills University, India

Reviewers:

(1) Umar M Mulani, KJ College of Engineering and Management Research, India.

(2) Sibaram Prasad Panda, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lakshminarayana Reddy Kothapalli Sondanti, U.S. Bank, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umar M Mulani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sibaram Prasad Panda, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Academic Deans’ Digital Leadership and Faculty Members’ Digital Literacy in a State University in the Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines

Reviewers:

(1) Vivek Jain, USA.

(2) Ashutosh Prabhakar, Central University of South Bihar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Andreas Wijaya, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Pornchai Jedaman, Rajabath Maha Sarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vivek Jain, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashutosh Prabhakar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: State-of-the-Art: A Study of Big Data in African Historical Research

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Figen Balo, Firat University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ipsita Chakrabarty, Guru Nanak Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Eleni Kolokouri, University of Ioannina, Greece.

(3) Anila A. Pillai, Prof. V. B. Shah Institute of Management, R.V. Patel and V. L. Shah College of Commerce and Sutex Bank College of Computer Applications & Science. V.N.S.G.U, India.

(4) P S Shanmugaboopathi, Maruthi College of Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ipsita Chakrabarty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eleni Kolokouri, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anila A. Pillai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (P S Shanmugaboopathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Haematologic and Haemostatic Profiles of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive Subjects on Two Anti-retroviral Regimens in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Samia Hassan Rizk, Cairo University, Egypt

Reviewers:

(1) Putu Dewinta Darmada, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia.

(2) I Made Susila Utama, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(3) Ashfaque Hossain, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhijeet Sharma, Subharti University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Putu Dewinta Darmada, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (I Made Susila Utama, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashfaque Hossain, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbiological and Biochemical Characterization of Plant Based Vegan Curd

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal

Reviewers:

(1) Jagadeesh. U, India.

(2) Rafaella Chandraseta Megananda, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayoade Rukayat Biodun, Ave Maria University, Piyanko, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jagadeesh. U, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rafaella Chandraseta Megananda, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Financial Assistance and Aspirations of Students from Sylhet: The Role of Family Support

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, UP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Thamarasseri, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(2) Nakalembe Immaculate, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lorraine Yu Yan Lee, Hong Kong International School, Hong Kong.

(2) Nasiru Abubakar Katami, Sokoto State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ismail Thamarasseri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nakalembe Immaculate, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The 100 most-cited articles on intracanal medication: A bibliometric analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China

Reviewers:

(1) Dorsa Rahi, University of California Irvine, US.

(2) Sunny Mavi, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences& Research, India.

(3) Himanshu Srivastava, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manovijay Balagangadharan, VMSDC, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.27/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorsa Rahi, US) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunny Mavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Himanshu Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Chelated Iron and Zinc Application Methods on Soil Properties and Micronutrient Availability during Rice Growth Stages

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Siddhi Gupta, Maharaja Ganga Singh University , India.

(2) Anand Dinesh Jejal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siddhi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anand Dinesh Jejal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Cross-Sectional Study of Heavy Metal Presence and the Health Implications among Automobile Repairers at Benin City Metropolis, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering,India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sreeja PA, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, India.

(2) Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, Tamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalithaa Fisheries University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sreeja PA, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA