Peer Review History: Physicochemical and Organoleptic Characteristics of Syrup and Raw Sugars Obtained from Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis) Sap

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Victoria Auhoiza Joshua, Kogi State Polytechnic, Lokoja, Nigeria.

(2) Stella Chiamaka Onukogu, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Victoria Auhoiza Joshua, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Stella Chiamaka Onukogu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Maize Growth, Yield, and Economic Returns as Influenced by Phosphorus and Defoliants in a Pigeonpea-Maize Cropping System under rainfed conditions in Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucas Carneiro Maciel, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Brazil.

(2) Rupa Matheus, State Agricultural Polytechnic of Kupang, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sjarifuddin Ende, College of Agricultural Science MujahidinTolitoli, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lucas Carneiro Maciel, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rupa Matheus, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Psidium guajava (Guava) Leaf Extract in Lead Acetate-Induced Male Reproductive Dysfunction in Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anjalee G. Ovhal, Jaipur National University Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chikaodili Nwando Obi-Ezeani, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

(2) Putra Agina Widyaswara Suwaryo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chikaodili Nwando Obi-Ezeani, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Putra Agina Widyaswara Suwaryo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Perspectives of Health and Social Care Workers on the Influence of CQC-Regulated Services on Providers in the Health and Social Care Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Anthonia Ifeoma Okafor, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.

(2) Shaik Mohiuddin, Al Dhafra Hospitals (PureHealth Group), United Arab Emirates.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) AHYAR WAHYUDI, Lembaga Akreditasi Fasilitas Kesehatan Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anthonia Ifeoma Okafor, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaik Mohiuddin, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J. ch from CJAST to AJARR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Gray Leaf Spot Resistance among Selected F2 Maize (Zea mays L.) Population Using Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohunnad Abd Al-Kariem Massimi, University of Debrecen, Hungary.

(2) Saket Kumar, KPS Degree College Bundelkhand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohunnad Abd Al-Kariem Massimi, Hungary) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saket Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Levels of Amla (Emblica officinalis) Fruit Powder Supplementation on the Production Performance of Broilers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

(2) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Paulino A Onal, University of Negros Occidental-Recoletos, Philippines.

(2) Lopamudra Samantaray, Utkal University, India.

(3) Edeh, Ifeanyi Edeh, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar Sawal, ICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paulino A Onal, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lopamudra Samantaray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Edeh, Ifeanyi Edeh, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Cover Crops in Mitigating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agricultural Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishna Prasad Sapkota, University of California Davis, Nepal.

(2) Akshay Kumar Yogi, International Crops Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishna Prasad Sapkota, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akshay Kumar Yogi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Climate Change on the Agriculture Sector in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S , Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Devanshu Dixit, Atarra Post Graduate College, India.

(2) Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devanshu Dixit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Effect of Physalis angulata Fruit Extract on Hormone-induced Uterine Fibroids in Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushma Vishnu Ghuge, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(2) Angham Najah Alkhafaji, Alfurat Alawsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Peter Ozomata BALOGUN, University Claude Bernard, France.

(4) Sagar Narendra Ande, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushma Vishnu Ghuge, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angham Najah Alkhafaji, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Peter Ozomata BALOGUN, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sagar Narendra Ande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dimensional analysis of cantrang fishing gear and its implications for the ecology and biology of fish in the Ancam River estuary, North Kalimantan, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Manuel Mendoza-Carranza, The south border College,  Mexico.

(2) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, State  University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Anupa Biswas, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Muhammad Yusuf, Cokroaminoto University Makassar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aslı Şalcıoğlu, Koç University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anupa Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Yusuf, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA