Peer Review History: Dynamic Routing Resilience in MANETs: A Bio-Inspired SORA Framework with Ant Colony-driven Security and Scalability

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Shakir Mehdiyev, Institute of Information Technology of Ministry of Science and Education, Azerbaijan.

(2) Mahesh Kumar Goyal, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shakir Mehdiyev, Azerbaijan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Kumar Goyal, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Engineering Ghana’s Future: The Impact of Emerging Technologies and Digital Transformation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University. Alexandria. Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhaivat Shah, Sardar Vallabhbhai Global University, India.

(2) Chandra Bhooshan Singh, Kalinga University, India.

(3) Yijie Weng, University of Maryland College Park, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Khaled Azzam, Jordan.

(2) Shankha Shubhra Goswami, Abacus Institute of Engineering and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhaivat Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chandra Bhooshan Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yijie Weng, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Northeast and India’s Look East Policy: A Critical Analysis of Driven Development Model and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. John M. Polimeni, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bindeswar Prasad Lekhak, Waseda University, Japan.

(2) Le Thai Son, Viet Nam Aviation Academy, Viet Nam.

(3) Majid Heidari, University of Salerno, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bindeswar Prasad Lekhak, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Le Thai Son, Viet Nam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Majid Heidari, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Active Methodology in the Medicine Course at a Public University in Northern Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Karimeldin Mohamed Ali Salih, University of Bisha, KSA.

(2) Debasri Dey, Brainware University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karimeldin Mohamed Ali Salih, KSA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debasri Dey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Solving Quadratic Equations with Complex Coefficients & Determining the Square Root for any Complex Number

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Cristian Octav Olteanu, Polytechnique University of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) P. Jamuna Devi, A.D.M College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ilia Romanovich Artser, ITMO University, Russian Federation.

(2) Mohd. Murtaja, Chaudhary Charan Singh University Campus, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cristian Octav Olteanu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Jamuna Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Breast to Sclera: A Silent and Devastating Invasion

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmad M. Mansour, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Ashok Bhagwat, Samarth College of Pharmacy, Belhe, India.

(2) Abhishek Kumar, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, India.

(3) Londhe Shashikala Ramchandra, MUHS Maharashtra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajay Ashok Bhagwat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Londhe Shashikala Ramchandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Alternaria Leaf Spot of Asalio through Fungicides

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhagyashree Khamari, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Sahar Sharkawy Abdallh Ahmed Sharkawy, Plant Pathology Researcher Diseases Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Star Luikham, India.

(2) V. Ambikapathy, A.V.V.M. Sri Pushpam College (Autonomous) (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Trichy-24), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhagyashree Khamari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sahar Sharkawy Abdallh Ahmed Sharkawy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Development of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties Affected as Agronomic Biofortification through Zinc and Iron

Editor(s):

(1) Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sk Md Asif, Brainware University, India.

(2) Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(3) Arpita Rani Roy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arun Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Luma abdalalah sgban Alabadi, College of Agriculture, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sk Md Asif, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Daraj Uddin Prodhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arpita Rani Roy, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Role of Blockchain Technology in Enhancing Transparency: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Al-Shourbaji, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Yasir, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chittaranjan Pradhan, United States.

(2) Mahmood Subhy Mahmood, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Al-Shourbaji, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yasir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterizing Physico-Chemical Parameters of Raw Paint-Based Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Abuja, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research institute for health sciences , Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Nyiransabimana Drocelle, University of Lay Adventists of Kigali, Rwanda.

(2) Hina Shehnaz, Sindh Madressatul Islam University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.R.Rajan, The Gandhigram Rural Institute-Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nyiransabimana Drocelle, Rwanda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hina Shehnaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA