Peer Review History: Integrated Nutrient Management in Potato-baby Corn Cropping Sequence and Its Impact on Soil Quality and Yield

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON levent, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sonia Panigrahi, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Mehdi Taheri Asghari, University of Paiam-e-Noor, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Javad Sarhadi, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sonia Panigrahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehdi Taheri Asghari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance of Different Varieties of Mango in North Gujarat Condition under Different Plant Spacing

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Kumaresan, Vels Institutes of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(2) Erecson Sipin Solis, Camiguin Polytechnic State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Osunleti, Samuel Oluwaseun, Edo State College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Kumaresan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Erecson Sipin Solis, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Food Insecurity in the Sundarbans: Multinomial Logit Approach Apropos the Food Insecurity Experience Scale Shruti Samadder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Shafaatu Bello Habib, Saadatu Rimi College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdullah Al Zabir, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.

(2) Piyush Saxena, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(3) Samson O Afolabi, GloriousVision University Formerly Samuel Adegboyega University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shafaatu Bello Habib, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Protein Alternatives: Exploring Plant-Based, Microbial and Novel Protein Sources

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tatjana Radosavljević, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul Uchechukwu Chidolue, Nigeria.

(2) Nureesun Mahamud, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Irem Kilinc, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paul Uchechukwu Chidolue, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nureesun Mahamud, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovations in Spray Drying Technology: Enhancing Food Processing and Nutritional Preservation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham R. Kamble, The Royal Gondwana College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Muhammad Bahadur Ali, Qatar.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham R. Kamble, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Bahadur Ali, Qatar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovation in Amla Jelly Millet Cake: Comprehensive Nutritional Profiling, Sensory Analysis, Microbial Assessment, and Packaging Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Thomas P. West, Texas A&M University-Commerce, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(2) Narayanasamy Sangeetha, Pondicherry University, India.

(3) Vikas Yadav, ICAR- CIAH-CHES, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alline Emannuele Chaves Ribeiro, Federal University of Goiás, Brazil.

(2) Dobrina Doncheva Tsvetkova, Medical University – Sofia Country, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.46/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narayanasamy Sangeetha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vikas Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Phosphorus Management on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Richa Sharma, SHUATS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Richa Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Nanotechnology in Soil Science: Recent Advances in Soil Remediation, Fertilization and Carbon Sequestration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Gitanjali Jothiprakash, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Georgescu Puiu Lucian, University Lower Danube of Galati, Romania.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gitanjali Jothiprakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria for Advanced Sustainable Agricultural Practices: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Dheivanai, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Amita Kajrolkar, India.

(3) Ahsan Saleem, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sreeja Bopin, KSV, Gandhinagar, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Dheivanai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amita Kajrolkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahsan Saleem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Advancements and Applications of 3DP Printing in Pharmaceutical Development and Biomedical Sciences

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Krupalkumar Morker, USA.

(2) Shubhrat Maheshwari, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, India.

(3) Sanatan Majhi, Utkal University, India.

(4) Omid Ashkani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anirudh Mehta, United States of America.

(2) Arsh Chanana, NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, NIMS University Rajasthan, India.

(3) Mahmoud Mahyoob Alburyhi, Sana’a University, Yemen.

(4) Mallamma T, Sri Adichunchanagiriri College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) S Manikandan, BGSB University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krupalkumar Morker, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubhrat Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanatan Majhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Omid Ashkani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA