Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) VINOTH KUMAR GANESAN, Rangaraya Medical College, India.

(2) Padmaja Jagati, Shailabala Women’s Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (VINOTH KUMAR GANESAN, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Padmaja Jagati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepa V H, M S Ramaiah College of Arts, Science and Commerce, India.

(2) Suraj Dhakal, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naveen Kumar S, WTC, IARI, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepa V H, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suraj Dhakal, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, WALMI Campus, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, India.

(2) Sazzala Jeevananda Reddy, India.

(3) Vigneswaran.K, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sazzala Jeevananda Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vigneswaran.K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Devendra Kumar Kurrey, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Mansur Bello Dogondaji, Shehu Shagari College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Apurbo Roy Chowdhury, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devendra Kumar Kurrey, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mansur Bello Dogondaji, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Tohif HusTohif Husen Tamboli, Fabtech College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Rinku Raheja, National PG College, University of Lucknow, India.

(3) Tamijeselvan S., Mother Theresa PG and Research Institute of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Sallam, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), United Arab Emirates.

(2) Muchukota Sushma, Aditya Bangalore Institute of Pharmacy Education and Research –(ABIPER), India.

(3) Nico Heiniger, FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Switzerland.

(4) Salunkhe Pratiksha Anil, Siddhi’s Institute of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.53/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tohif HusTohif Husen Tamboli, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rinku Raheja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tamijeselvan S., India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Chand Pathania, India.

(2) Suresh Kumar Shah, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dra. Daawia, University of Cenderawasih, Indonesia.

(2) Ipsita Samal, ICAR-National Research Centre on Litchi, India.

(3) Sachin Mahadev Chavan, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prakash Chand Pathania, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suresh Kumar Shah, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Narayan Lal, ICAR-IISS, India.

(2) Prajwol Rijal, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shuvadeep Halder, The Neotia University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narayan Lal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prajwol Rijal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Nitin Baban Misal, SVKM’s college of Agriculture, India.

(2) Neha Thakur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divya Bahuguna, Graphic Era Hill University, India.

(2) Farshid Talat, Iran.

(3) Miloudia Slaoui, University Mohammed V in Rabat, Morocoo.

(4) Ravindra Kumar, IGKV, India.

(5) Takele Zike Geneti, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nitin Baban Misal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Thakur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seda oğur, Bitlis Eren University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(3) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Harrison Lourenco Correa, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar Prajapati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harrison Lourenco Correa, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Akinbusola Olushola, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States.

(2) Ubada Aqeel, Jamia Hamdard, India.

(3) Tumu Rajasekhar, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Janakkumar Devendrabhai Trivedi, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(2) Mohammad Parhamfar, Iran.

(3) Mudasir Ahmad Tass, University of Kashmir, India.

(4) Dipalee Divakar Rane, D. Y. Patil College of Engineering, India.

(5) P.Senthil Pandian, AAA College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akinbusola Olushola, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ubada Aqeel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tumu Rajasekhar, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA