Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Growth and Yield Response of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) to Different Rates of Phosphorous and Potassium Application

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajap Shiva Kumar, India.

(2) Ashutosh Singhm, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, India.

(3) Shweta, CCS HAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) E.Aruna, ANGRAU, India.

(2) Shyamrao Kulkarni, India.

(3) Leonardo Ornella, Spain.

(4) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajap Shiva Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashutosh Singhm, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shweta, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Emerging Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella: Implications for Public Health and Veterinary Medicine

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Almou Abdoulaye Alio, University Abdou Moumouni, Niger.

(2) Oluwafemi A. Ajenifuja, The Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(3) Rania Saleh Mohamed, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alhadj Markhous Nazal, University of Sarh, Chad.

(2) Baleshwari Dixit, College of Veterinary Science and Epidemiology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Almou Abdoulaye Alio, Niger) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluwafemi A. Ajenifuja, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rania Saleh Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Incidence of Fruit Flies [Bactrocera spp. (Tephritidae: Diptera)] on Economically Important Guava Fruit in Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujay Hurali, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Fawad Khan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khushwinder Singh, Guru Kashi University, India.

(2) Ahmad Ali, Shihezi University China, Pakistan.

(3) Soumik Dey Roy, Brainware University, India.

(4) Moses Gachoka Wainaina, Chuka University, Kenya.

(5) Simphiwe Ntokozo Mnguni, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujay Hurali, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fawad Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Integrated Approaches to Diabetes-related Vascular and Neurological Complications: Advances and Challenges

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Concordia, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreshtha Gaur, Banasthali University, India.

(2) Kanamala Arun Chand Roby, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India.

(3) Jyoti Trivedi, Autonomous State Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shreshtha Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanamala Arun Chand Roby, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jyoti Trivedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Analyzing Land Use Change and Fragmentation Using Earth Observation Data: A Case Study of the Ken River Basin, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Mustaquim, Aliah University, India.

(2) Thudugalage Don Chaminda Pushpakumara, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Mustaquim, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thudugalage Don Chaminda Pushpakumara, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Analyzing Financial Stability and Performance of Indian Banks through Capital Adequacy and Debt-equity Ratios: A Comprehensive Statistical Analysis

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Ikapel Omete, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Prakash Pinto, St Joseph Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bandaru Srinivasa Rao, VFSTR Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Joseph Benjamin Gwabin, College of Education Gidan-Waya Kafanchan, Nigeria.

(3) Mohd Iftikhar Baig, Mizoram University, India.

(4) Syed Abdulla Al Mamun, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Ikapel Omete, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prakash Pinto, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: External and Domestic Debt: Which is More Beneficial for Long-term Economic Growth?

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sitki Selim Dolanay, Turkiye.

(2) Ifeanyi O. Nwanna, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muideen Adejare Isiaka, Crescent University Abeokuta, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sitki Selim Dolanay, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ifeanyi O. Nwanna, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing Socio-economic Conditions and Fisheries Management Strategies in Cooperative Societies of Niwas Block, Madhya Pradesh, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaurav Nurhari Lanjewar, Dr. B.S.K.K.V, India.

(2) Sanee Chauhan, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Huirem Bharati, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaurav Nurhari Lanjewar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanee Chauhan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Determining the Effect of Date of Sowing and Spacing on Forage Yield of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Oğuz Dolgun, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Rekhashree Kalita, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anil Kumar, Prof. Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) E.Aruna, ANGRAU, India.

(2) Olena Boika, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rekhashree Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Optimization of Fruit Bar Formulation: A Comprehensive Study on Physicochemical and Sensory Properties

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akanksha Yadav, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tercentenary University, India.

(2) Oyinloye Olaitan Daniel, Federal Polytechnic Ede, Nigeria.

(3) Shella B Cacatian, Cagayan State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akanksha Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oyinloye Olaitan Daniel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shella B Cacatian, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA