Peer Review History: Outcome of Early Versus Delayed Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Single Center Experience

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Liviu Dubei, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania.

(2) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Liviu Dubei, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deepak Sethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Production, Optimization and Validation of Fig Gum Products for Extended Shelf-life

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepa K, Mercy College Palakkad, India.

(2) Vishalsing Nagosing Patil, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deepa K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vishalsing Nagosing Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Enhancing Job Satisfaction and Performance among High School Teachers in Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Luqman Mahmud, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Hillary Shikokoti, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Luqman Mahmud, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hillary Shikokoti, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Online Mathematics Teaching in China: A Case Study in High Schools (2020-2025)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Wei Liu, Hillcrest Christian College Crest Education, Australia.

(2) Jerito Pereira, Institute Superior Cristal, Timor Leste.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wei Liu, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jerito Pereira, Timor Leste) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Loan Performance through Effective Credit Risk Management: Evidence from Commercial Banks in Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Pratap Pandurang Halkarnikar, D Y Patil Institute of Engineering, India.

(2) Devendra Malapati, Sri Venkateswara College(University of Delhi), India.

(3) Suresh Babu Nalliboyina, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies (APIIIT)-Nuzvid, India.

(4) Andrew Kubo Mlawasi, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divine Atinyo, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.57/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pratap Pandurang Halkarnikar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Devendra Malapati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Suresh Babu Nalliboyina, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Andrew Kubo Mlawasi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigation on the Shear Performance of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Bars

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. G. Anusha, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhamad Soffi Manda, Polytechnic Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Shaimaa Muthana Abdulrhman, Technological University, Iraq.

(3) Murtada Ameer Ismael, University of Diyala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R Vivekanandan, Government College of Engineering, India.

(2) Samuel Sakyi Koram, University of Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Shodolapo Oluyemi Franklin, Gaborone University College of Law and Professional Studies, Botswana.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muhamad Soffi Manda, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shaimaa Muthana Abdulrhman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Murtada Ameer Ismael, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Loan Performance for Commercial Banks’ Sustainability: A Systematic Review Following PRISMA Guidelines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Noor Ul Ain Khan, University of Chakwal, Pakistan.

(2) Ashraf Shahriar, Eastern University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fahad Afzal, Institute of Health Management Research, IIHMR University, India.

(2) Shengyu Gu, Huizhou University, China.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Noor Ul Ain Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ashraf Shahriar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Nutritional and Organoleptic Properties of Breakfast Cereals Formulated from Hungry Rice, Bambara Groundnut and Carrot Flour Blends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria.

(2) Jhoseline Stayce Guillen Sanchez, César Vallejo University, Peru.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ir. Bambang Kunarto, Semarang University, Indonesia.

(2) Oluwasanmi M. Odeniran, Kansas State University, USA.

(3) Ndi Betrand Bongjo, Centre for Food Technology and Research, Benue State University, Nigeria.

(4) Vijayata Sengar, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jhoseline Stayce Guillen Sanchez, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Statistical Estimation in Piecewise Linear Regression Models

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamal Pramanick, National Institute of Technology Calicut, India.

(2) Mohammed Ahmed Abbas, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Omar Abdulmohsin Ali, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tamal Pramanick, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Ahmed Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Cybersecurity Governance on National Security by Strengthening Critical Infrastructure through IT Auditing and Risk Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Sai Surya Mounika Dandyala, Northeastern University, USA.

(2) Nathan Oluchukwu, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(3) Priyanka Neelakrishnan, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abuh Ibrahim Sani, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

(2) Ayokunle Akinsanya, United States.

(3) Kwubeghari Anthony, Nigerian Television Authotity(NTA) , (NTA Television College), Nigeria.

(4) Mohammad Salem Hamidi, Jahan University, Afghanistan.

(5) N.Kala Baskar, University of Madras, India.

(6) Vishal Patel, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sai Surya Mounika Dandyala, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nathan Oluchukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Neelakrishnan, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA