Peer Review History: Heavy Metals Composition in Fish Species from Oron River Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, National University of Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nandar Aye Winn, Myanmar.

(2) Radhika R, NSS Hindu College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aslamiyya Salihu Hussain, Federal University Dutse, Nigeria.

(2) Ibrahim Mahmoud Ahmed Ibrahim, Egypt.

(3) Janardan Pathak, B.Borooah College, India.

(4) Lokenath Chakraborty, ICAR-Central Inland Fishery Research Institute, India.

(5) Abul Mansur, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(6) Rasha Ahmed Hashim,  Universityof Baghdad, Iraq.

(7) Sahar Sabahi, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(8) Saheed Kolawole, Istanbul University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nandar Aye Winn, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radhika R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic Performance of Rapid Screening and ELISA Methods in the Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen among Patients Attending Tertiary Healthcare Facilities in Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhupendra Kumar Mandawat, Government Medical College, India.

(2) Ramzy Muorwel Matueny, Juba Teaching Hospital, South Sudan.

(3) Ozgur Sahin, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Hospital, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Kumar Sharma, UNS ASMC, India.

(2) K.V.Sreedhara Babu, Sri Venkateswara Institute Of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Shikha Garg, BFUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhupendra Kumar Mandawat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramzy Muorwel Matueny, South Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ozgur Sahin, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Biofertilizers Based on Mycorrhizal Fungi (Rhizophagus intraradices) and Aquatic Ferns (Azolla filiculoïdes) on Agromorphological Parameters of Chilli Pepper (Capsicum chinense L.) Grown on Distric Plinthic Ferralsol in Daloa, Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Moreira Martine Ramon Felipe, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanja Kajic, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

(2) Zichen Wang, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanja Kajic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zichen Wang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Automatic Orientation of Student Candidates Based on Memory-based Collaborative Filtering

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Raja Sarath Kumar Boddu, Malla Reddy University, India.

(2) H S Prasantha, Atria University Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandani Sharma, MMICTBM (MCA) Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Radhakrishna Karne, CMR Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Thenmozhi Ganesan, Alagappa University, India.

Yi Wu, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raja Sarath Kumar Boddu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H S Prasantha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Histopathological Effects of Industrial Effluents on Lung Tissues of Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Heena Singh, Era’s Lucknow Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Kshitij Bhikhubhai Dhameliya, RK University, India.

(3) Suvarna Ingale, SCES’ s Indira College of Pharmacy Pune, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Sujatha, Bharathi Women’s College (A), India.

(2) Rajneesh Anand, Lehigh University, USA.

(3) U. D Iliemene, Bingham University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Heena Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kshitij Bhikhubhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suvarna Ingale, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Applications of Nanotechnology in Agriculture: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Midde Sai Kumar, Mallareddy University, India.

(2) Garima Pathak, B.D.College, Patliputra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Mahmoud Alkolaly, Agriculture Research Center- Plant Pathology Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Midde Sai Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garima Pathak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: On the Efficiency of Generalized Version Exponential Ratio Cum to Dual-Ratio Cum Type Estimator Via Robust Measure

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, School of Mathematics and Physics, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurdistan Ibrahim Mawlood, University of Salahaddin-Erbil, Iraq.

(2) Tersoo Uba, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kurdistan Ibrahim Mawlood, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tersoo Uba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vine Length, Fruit Lycopene and Carotene Contents as Influenced by Fertilizer, Salinity and Bicarbonate Treatments in Snake Tomato (Tricosanthes cucumerina L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Shaimaa N.Mizil, Al-Mustansiriyah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hera Oana,l Institutul de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru Pomicultura, Romania.

(2) Kubra Aslan, Faculty of Science, Ataturk University, Turkey.

(3) Majid A. Ibrahim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) Palak Kansal, Kanya Gurukul, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be University), India.

(5) Pooja S Beleri, University of Agricultural Sciences Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaimaa N.Mizil, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of C-Arm Guided and Open Intramedullary Pin Fixation for Long Bone Fractures in Dogs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Kamalakar, NTR College Of Veterinary Science, India.

(2) Surbhi Kuldeep Tyagi, COVAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Surbhi Kuldeep Tyagi, COVAS, SVPUAT-Modipuram, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Kamalakar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Surbhi Kuldeep Tyagi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Grain-borne Fungi on Farmer Saved Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sawan Kumar, CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Malik Ahsaf Aziz, SKUAST-K, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sawan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Malik Ahsaf Aziz, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA