Peer Review History: Effect of Pearl Millet Flour on Quality of Chicken Patties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Manasa R, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Mohammmed Alhadi Ebrahiem Mahmoud, University of Kordofan, Sudan.

(3) Amin Dawi Wakawa, Federal College of Agricultural Produce Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manasa R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammmed Alhadi Ebrahiem Mahmoud, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amin Dawi Wakawa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and Its Key Milestones: A Review of Last Five Decades

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Seyed Alireza Mousavi Shirazi, Islamic AZAD University, Iran.

(2) Prof. Khalil KASSMI, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco.

(3) Dr. Jelena Purenovic, Kragujevac  University, Cacak, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandra Shekhar, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, India.

(2) Atanas Marinov Atanassov, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(3) Anand Kumar Sharma, ISRO, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bengi Bayar, Middle East Technical University, Turkiye.

(2) Marcos Cesar Danhoni Neves, State University of Maringá, Brazil.

(3) Subhajit Hazra, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandra Shekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atanas Marinov Atanassov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anand Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Natural Farming: A Sustainable Way towards Doubling Farmers’ Income

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushan Chowhan, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Bangladesh.

(2) Nalin Rai, Jain University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandrika Sharma, College of Agriculture, J.N.K.V.V, India.

(2) Ernantje Hendrik, Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia.

(3) Vidyawati, College of Agribusiness Management, GBPUA&T, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushan Chowhan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nalin Rai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Replacement of a High-fat Diet with a Standard Chow Diet Reduces Daytime Food Intake in Obese Mice and Normalizes Fat Accumulation and Metabolic Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Zoran Todorovic, University of Belgrade and University Medical Center “Bezanijskakosa”, Serbia

Reviewers:

(1) Saptarshi Mukherjee, India

(2) Wilmar Jun o. Elopre, Central Mindanao University, Philippines

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saptarshi Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wilmar Jun o. Elopre, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enumeration of Native Rhizobial Population Nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris of North-western Himalaya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar, Mahatma Gandhi University of Horticulture and Forestry, India

(2) Hon-Dr Radoslaw Walkowiak, Poland

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hon-Dr Radoslaw Walkowiak, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Drosophila melanogaster as a Substitute Model Organism for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tapasya Pal, University of Waikato, New Zealand

(2) Suchitra Kavuri, Alluri Sitarama Raju Academy of Medical Sciences, India

(3) L. Salomi Sangeetha, The DR. M.G.R. Medical University, Immaculate College of Nursing, India

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pronab Ganguly, Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tapasya Pal, New Zealand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suchitra Kavuri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (L. Salomi Sangeetha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Stress Hormones Released Pattern in Blood Donors and Its Impact on Blood Quality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Davina Hijam, Associate Professor, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhananjaya S G, Davanagere University, India

(2) Nasr Tarq, University of Baghdad, Iraq

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ljubinka Nikolic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Serbia.

(2) Wasan Kadhim Jawad, Jabir Ibn Hayyan University for Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhananjaya S G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasr Tarq, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Review on Algorithmic Approaches to Solving Knapsack Problem

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Preetha P S, Jain Institute of Technology, India

(2) Derya DOGAN DURGUN, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turkey

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olena Osharovska, State University of Intelligent Technologies and Telecommunications, Ukraine.

(2) Yassine Adouani, The Higher Institute of Management of Gabès , University of Gabes, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Preetha P S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Derya DOGAN DURGUN, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Obesity on Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: A Retrospective Analysis in Kiambu County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Diana Cecilia Tapia-Pancardo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico

Reviewers:

(1) Debora Fernandes Pinheiro, Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste (UNICENTRO), Brasil

(2) Olorunniyi Shola Blessing, Federal Medical Centre, Nigeria

(3) Che Jane Nchangnwi, University of Buea, Cameroon

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debora Fernandes Pinheiro, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olorunniyi Shola Blessing, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Che Jane Nchangnwi, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Some Inequalities via Functional Type Generalization of Cauchy-Bunyakovsky- Schwarz Inequality

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tatyana A. Komleva, Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine

Reviewers:

(1) Messaouda TERCHI, University Center of Barika, Algeria

(2) Ahmed A. Hamoud, Taiz University, Yemen

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Messaouda TERCHI, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed A. Hamoud, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA