Peer Review History: Phytochemical Analysis and Ocular Benefits of Terminalia chebula Extracts for Myopia Treatment: In vitro and In silico Approaches

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Principal, Rajeev College of Pharmacy, (Affiliated to RGUHS, Bangalore), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pragati Khare, BPS Educational Institution of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Prasad Yewale, Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College Hospital & Research Center, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research (D.U.), India.

(3) Sonam Bhutia, Government Pharmacy College Sajong, Sikkim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arbind Kumar, Govt. Erode Medical college & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pragati Khare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prasad Yewale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sonam Bhutia, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Roles of Master Teachers in Balancing Teaching and Leadership in Pudtol District, Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Jobell B. Jajalla, Kapalong College of Agriculture, Sciences and Technology, Philippines.

(2) Low Jie Ying, Institute of Teacher Education, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Soceline N. Batisla-Ong, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology- Dingle Campus, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jobell B. Jajalla, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Low Jie Ying, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysing Costs and Marketing Channels in Natural Rubber Marketing in Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Lisa Nesti, Polytechnic ATI Padang, Indonesia.

(2) Pradip Chouhan, National Law University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lisa Nesti, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradip Chouhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: On Certain Results On The Diophantine Equation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Joachim Moussounda Mouanda, Blessington Christian University, Republic of Congo.

(2) Manju Somanath, National College, India.

(3) Ozen Ozer, Kirklareli University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joachim Moussounda Mouanda, Republic of Congo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manju Somanath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ozen Ozer, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Potential of Ginger-supplemented Diet in Reversing Lead-induced Nephrotoxicity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA and Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasbi Taobah Ramdani, Institute Karsa Husada, Indonesia.

(2) Mriganka Mandal, DR. Kanailal Bhattacharyya College, The University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasbi Taobah Ramdani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mriganka Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sclerosing Polycystic Adenosis of Minor Salivary Glands: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. B. Niveditha, Associate Professor, Madha Dental College and Hospital, (Affiliated to The Tamilnadu Dr Mgr Medical University), India.

(2) Prof. Hamit Serdar Çotert, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarah Afaque, Career Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India.

(2) Imane Boujguenna, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geraldo Oliveira Silva-Junior, Rio de Janeiro State University , Brazil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarah Afaque, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imane Boujguenna, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dietary African Yam Bean Meal (Sphenostylis sternocarpa) as a Complementary Substitute for Soybean Meal in African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fingerlings: Effect on Intestinal Histology and Zootechnical Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Luis Enrique Ibarra Morales, Research Professor, State University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sana Yagoub Abdallah Tahir, Alneelain University, Sudan.

(2) Fathy Elshaer Mohammed Fathy, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria.

(2) Rehana Iqbal, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan.

(3) Mostafa A. M. Soliman, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sana Yagoub Abdallah Tahir, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fathy Elshaer Mohammed Fathy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sickle Cell Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is CRISPR-Cas9 the Breakthrough We’ve Been Waiting for?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Visiting Professor, School of Bio-Engineering, Centre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajeev Goel, Dr. R. P. Government Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Ghulam Akbar, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

(3) Abderrahmane Moundir, Hassan II University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajeev Goel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghulam Akbar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abderrahmane Moundir, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Nutritional and Antinutritional Qualities of Local and Breeder Tomato Improved Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yashwant Kumar Patel, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Amit Saurabh, Eternal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Rashad Gouda Youssif, Food Technology Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yashwant Kumar Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Saurabh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Soil Microbiome in Enhancing Plant Nutrition and Promoting Soil Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja S Beleri, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Bijay K. Mohanty, Khallikote University, India.

(3) Adarsh Kumar Meena, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(4) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nipun Bariya, Veer Narmad South Gujarat Univeristy, Dr. A P  J Abdul Kalam Govt. College Silvassa, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja S Beleri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bijay K. Mohanty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adarsh Kumar Meena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Borozan Aurica, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA