Peer Review History: The Role of Green Manures in Sustaining Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Sivanagaraju, Vignan Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, India.

(2) Jatiprasad Barala, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Boris Boincean, Republic of Moldova.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Sivanagaraju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jatiprasad Barala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Review on Role of Fluorinated Scaffolds in Pharmaceutical Chemistry: Enhancing Drug Properties through Strategic Fluorination

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kehinde Ezekiel Ajibulu, Bamidele Olumilia University of Education Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Shaimaa Ahmad Hassan, Al Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(3) Jyotsna V. Khobragade, Guru Nanak College of Science Ballarpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syeda Sameena Aziz, Anwarul Uloom College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kehinde Ezekiel Ajibulu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaimaa Ahmad Hassan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jyotsna V. Khobragade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Construction and Standardization of a Mental Imagery Scale for Secondary Level Students

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Bless G. Ampuan, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Turdimuratov Dilmurad Yuldashevich, Termez State Pedagogical Institute, Republic of Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bless G. Ampuan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Turdimuratov Dilmurad Yuldashevich, Republic of Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Experimental Investigation on Sustainable Soil Stabilization Using Coconut Coir Fibre

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashutosh Kumar, Mohan Babu University Tirupati, India.

(2) D Bharath Naik, Methodist College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashutosh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Bharath Naik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Organic Weed Control Strategies on Profitability and Cost–Benefit Ratio of Urdbean

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) R. S. Patode, India.

(2) Suhad Mathkoor Abdulsaheb Safi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. S. Patode, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhad Mathkoor Abdulsaheb Safi, University of Baghdad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Zinc Application Strategies on Growth, Productivity, Zinc Uptake by Rice and Residual Soil Zinc Status under Rice-Wheat Cropping System of Central India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mama Julius, Uganda & South Sudan.

(2) Radka Bozhinova, Agricultural Academy, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Manimaran, Imayam Institute of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Sunandana Mandal, Moyna College, Vidyasagar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mama Julius, Uganda & South Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radka Bozhinova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Yield of Sorghum (Bio-Fortified cv. Parbhani Shakti) through Land Configuration and Integrated Nutrient Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kartick Chandra Mandal , The University of Burdwan , India .

(2) Ganesh Ravindra Pawar, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Laxman Navi, ARS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kartick Chandra Mandal , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganesh Ravindra Pawar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Laxman Navi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Population Dynamics of Major Insect Pests of Little Millet (Panicum sumatrense L.) in Relation to Weather Parameters in Eastern India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Salih Khalaf Atyiah, Iraq.

(2) Maan Al-Salihi, College of Science, Iraq.

(3) Mahesh Vitthal Sutar, Shivaji University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dwarka, JNKVV, India.

(2) Mary Aricha Yakubu, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(3) Miroslav Antov, University of Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”, Bulgaria.

(4) Victor Adolfo Gomez Lopez, Universidad Nacional de Asuncion, Paraguay.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salih Khalaf Atyiah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maan Al-Salihi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahesh Vitthal Sutar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Retrotransposons: From “Junk DNA” to Drivers of Fruit Crop Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Liubov Ishchuk, National Dendrological Park «Sofiyivka» of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) A. REVATHI, VELLALAR COLLEGE FOR WOMEN(AUTONOMOUS), INDIA.

(3) Nahla El-Sherif, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. Shahitha, Muthayammal College Of Arts And Science(AUTONOMOUS), Tamilnadu.

(2) Ahmed Mahmood Rajab, Iraq.

(3) Sharvan Kumar, Maharishi University of Information Technology, India.

(4) Vivek N. Upasani, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Liubov Ishchuk, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. REVATHI, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nahla El-Sherif, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Organic Weed Management Strategies for Weed Suppression, Nutrient Dynamics and Yield Enhancement in Urdbean (Vigna mungo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hüseyin CÜCE, Giresun University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) GM Imran, Navsari Agricultural University, India .

(2) Bharti Choudhary, JNKVV Jabalpur, India.

(3) R.Srinivasa Rao, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alam Hazarika, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anita Mahapatra, OUAT,Bhubaneswar, India.

(3) D Nagaraju, Government City College (A), India.

(4) Ida Nursanti, Batanghari University, Indonesia.

(5) Joydeep Das, Midnapore City College, India.

(6) Muhammad Ather Nadeem, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

(7) S Madhusree, Annamalai University, India.

(8) S. Manimaran, Annamalai University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (GM Imran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bharti Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.Srinivasa Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA