Peer Review History: Endotyping Cellular and Humoral Cross-Reactivity between Blomia tropicalis and Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis in Patients with Allergic Multimorbidity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Cynthia Aracely Alvizo Báez, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamlesh P. Bagmar, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Begum Gorgulu Akin, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Turkey .

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamlesh P. Bagmar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bushra Jasim Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Begum Gorgulu Akin, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Endotyping Cellular and Humoral Cross-reactivity among Canine, Feline, and Swine Allergens in Patients with Allergic Multimorbidity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagner Loyola, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), Concordia, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Berghi Ovidiu, Reteaua Medicala Sfanta Maria Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Obodo Basil Nnaemeka, Purdue University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anurekha jain , TIT college of pharmacy, Indian.

(2) Gopala Krishna. Ganta , University of Michigan, USA.

(3) Keshav Gupta, Shri Shankaracharya University Bhilai Chattisgarh, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Berghi Ovidiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Obodo Basil Nnaemeka, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on the Trade Competitiveness and Complementarity of Industrial Robots between China and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Member States

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Solomon Audu, Caleb University, Nigeria.

(2) D Lateef Kolawole Fijabi, Precious Cornerstone University, Nigeria.

(3) Sunjida Khan, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anand Shankar Paswan, University of Allahabad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Solomon Audu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Lateef Kolawole Fijabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunjida Khan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Outcome of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Prospective Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands.

(2) Dr. Vinoth Prabhu Veeramani, University of Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Amrut Arun Swami, Dr. S. S. Tantia Medical College, India.

(2) Anne Varghese, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amrut Arun Swami, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anne Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Livelihood Diversification and Food Security among Crop Farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Dr. Mohammad Hassan Sayyari Zahan, University of Birjand, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Udit Maheshwari, MMMUT, India.

(2) Suraj Gaudel, LA GRANDEE International College, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Biswajit Satpathy, Sambalpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Udit Maheshwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suraj Gaudel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural Sector as a Driver of Regional Economic Growth: Evidence from GRDP and Location Quotient Analysis in Langkat Regency, Indonesia (2019–2023)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kale Kaupa, Papua New Guinea University of Techology, Lae, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea.

(2) Champa Bosu, Chouddagram Government College, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pancawati Hardiningsih, Stikubank University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kale Kaupa, Papua New Guinea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Champa Bosu, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of technological gap and constraints in Adoption of Chickpea Production Technologies of UAS Dharwad in North Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Karla Sabrina Magalhaes Andrade Padilha, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) S.Parthasarathi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Karla Sabrina Magalhaes Andrade Padilha, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.Parthasarathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Do non-economic Factors Can Overcome the Mindset Barriers in Adoption of Conservation Agriculture?

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh , Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Devanshu Dixit, Atarra P. G. College, India.

(2) Ernantje Hendrik, Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Devanshu Dixit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ernantje Hendrik, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of F2 Population in Bitter Gourd

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Shinde Chetan Subhash, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Francisco Gordillo, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arafat Hossain, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Dhrumil Parsotambhai Patel, Marwadi University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shinde Chetan Subhash, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Francisco Gordillo, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield of Black Aromatic Rice (Oryza sativa L. indica)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Manish Tomar, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Yogesh Kumar H D, Sri Krishnadevaraya College of Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manish Tomar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar H D, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA