Peer Review History: In-vitro Analysis of Antifungal Plant Extracts Against Late Blight Disease Causing Phytophthora infestans

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Prince Kumar Gupta, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Wafaa Mokhtari, Institute Prince Sidi Mohamed de Gestion et Commerce Agricole, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prince Kumar Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wafaa Mokhtari, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compliance with Universal Standard Precautions and Perceived Influencing Factors among Nurses in a Tertiary Institution in Edo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Maniapl college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prerna Khati, Mangalyatan University, India.

(2) Serkan Elarslan, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Türkiye.

(3) Ekta Patel, Pioneer Nursing College, Vadodara, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Drishti Sagar, Janakpuri Super Speciality Hospital, India.

(2) Tolulope Tommy, Texila American University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prerna Khati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Serkan Elarslan, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ekta Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Awareness, Nutritional Knowledge, and Milk Product Consumption Patterns among Students of Anand and Vidyanagar City

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev ,All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Gangwar, India.

(2) Sk Habibur Rahaman, Techno India University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abel Alberto Massingue Júnior, Higher Polytechnic Institute of Gaza, Mozambique.

(2) Vinay G M, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mukesh Gangwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sk Habibur Rahaman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Occupational Health Problems of Secondary School Teachers in Anambra State Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Maniapl college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anuj Sheopuri, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, India.

(2) Ne Win, University of Public Health, Myanmar.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anuj Sheopuri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ne Win, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Descriptive Assessment of Maternal and Socio-cultural Factors Related to Focused Antenatal Care in Ekiti State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S, All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Meenakshi Sharma, Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Dipti Das, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Patna, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Birnur Yesildag, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Türkiye.

(2) Saira Mehnaz

(3) Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meenakshi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dipti Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Precision Agriculture: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Perception in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev ,All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Atiqur Rahma, India.

(2) S. Sheik Shalik, Annamalai University, India.

(3) Dhamchoe Dolma Bhutia, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Hemalatha, Sree Rama Engineering College, India.

(2) Narasimha Rao Boinapalli, USA.

(3) S.Balamurugan, JAIN(Deemed-to-be University), India.

(4) Yadav Uma Dharamraj, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atiqur Rahma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sheik Shalik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhamchoe Dolma Bhutia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Career and Professional Development Course on Undergraduates’ Entrepreneurial and Professional Skills Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Banco Bpm, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Aida R. Nurutdinova, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Russia.

(2) Suhaim Mhd Sarif, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shreshtha Mishra, Alpine Group of Institutes affiliated to Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, India.

(2) Swati Rai, Autonomous State Medical College Sultanpur, India.

(3) T. Naresh Naidu, Presidency University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aida R. Nurutdinova, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhaim Mhd Sarif, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Dates and Weed Management Practices on Yield Attributes of Summer Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiv Poojan Yadav, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Tech., India.

(2) Syed Manzoor ul Haq, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Pakistan.

(3) Hana Aboodeh, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Olena Boika, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiv Poojan Yadav, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Manzoor ul Haq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hana Aboodeh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Vegetative Response of Pomegranate cv. Bhagwa to Different Winter Pruning Intensities in the Subtropical Region of Himachal Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzafar Mir, SKUAST- Jammu, India.

(2) Harshit Jangid, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(3) Samarpita Roy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzafar Mir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harshit Jangid, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Samarpita Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Guava (Psidium Guajava L.) Cultivars Based on Morphological Traits and Yield performance in Tarai Region of Uttarakhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Petolescu Cerasela, University of Life Sciences “Regele Mihai I”, Timișoara, Romania.

(2) Hera Oana, Research Institute for Fruit Growing, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Petolescu Cerasela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hera Oana, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA