Peer Review History: Mutagenicity Effects of Sodium Hypochlorite on Morphological Parameters of Some Spiny Spinach (Amarantus spinosus) Grown in Dutse, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manju Lata Joshi, Maharana Pratap Govt. Degree College, India.

(2) Nasiruddin, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Liubov Ishchuk, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manju Lata Joshi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nasiruddin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Financial Performance of Wood Marketing and Family Agroforest Business in Delta State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Md. Abiar Rahman, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) T.Amose, The American College afflicted to Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Ismail UKAV, Adiyaman University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T.Amose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ismail UKAV, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nigella sativa Oil Attenuates 5-Fluorouracil-induced Oxidative Stress and Anxiety-like Behaviors in Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maria Emilia Cosenza Andraus, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/UFRJ, RJ, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Abishek B, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, India.

(2) Deepshikha Samdershi, Ranchi University, India.

(3) Enas Abdul-Sahib Badi, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abishek B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepshikha Samdershi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Enas Abdul-Sahib Badi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Geochemical and Isotopic Insights into Groundwater Dynamics and Sustainable Management in Mount Cameroon’s Volcanic Aquifer

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed M. El Nady, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Khaled Algadi, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Kiran Bala Behura, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Martinelli, Italy.

(2) Khemmoudj kaddour, A/Mira Bejaia University, Algeria.

(3) R.Kannan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khaled Algadi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kiran Bala Behura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of the Adoption of Improved Poultry Management Practices on the Income and Livelihood of Poultry Farmers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Chakawekesa, Kalro Biotechnology Research Institute, Kenya.

(2) Jyotsana, LUVAS, India.

(3) Sababa Fatima, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi AREMU, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) K Pushpa, IndoGerman Global Academy for Agroecology Research and Learning, India.

(3) Milena Milojević, Republic of Serbia.

(4) Rambabu Dharavath, PV Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Chakawekesa, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyotsana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sababa Fatima, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examining Students’ Study Habits and Their Impact on Performance in Chemistry Examination in Bungoma County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Syahban Amir, Institut Turatea, Indonesia.

(2) Gunawan, Universitas Muhamamdiyah Bone, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ericka Darmawan, Universitas Tidar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Syahban Amir, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gunawan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of High Tech Innovation Strategies in Leading Asian Economies and Implications for Uzbekistan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhushy Thillaivasan, Australia.

(2) Zdzislaw W. Puslecki, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland.

(3) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.Kalaiselvi, Vellalar college for women Thindal, India.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhushy Thillaivasan, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zdzislaw W. Puslecki, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Slim Chtioui, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Cropping System and the Farming Diversity of the Spinach Grown in Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Irshad Ali Saudagar, ICFRE-TFRI, Jabalpur, India.

(2) Lamria Sidauruk, Methodist University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Saba, King AbdulAziz University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Irshad Ali Saudagar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lamria Sidauruk, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Promoting Intangible Cultural Heritage through New Media: A Case Study of Nuo Culture Dissemination by a Chinese NGO

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Vincenzo De Masi, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Italy.

(2) Ali Mohammed Salih, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(3) Wu Jiabao, Changzhou College of Information Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dimple Khokhar, RIMT University, India.

(2) Oluseun Sunday Odusanya, Ajayi Crowther University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vincenzo De Masi, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Mohammed Salih, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wu Jiabao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1(No Response) | NA | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3 (Wu Jiabao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post-Reception: A Meta-Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarik A. A. Hassan, Egypt.

(2) Jyoti Dattatray Anap , India.

(3) Jenila Rani,  Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dipak Dadasaheb Nalawade, Dr.kolpe institute of pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  7.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tarik A. A. Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti Dattatray Anap , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jenila Rani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA