Peer Review History: Cauda Equina Syndrome Secondary to Massive L4–L5 Disc Herniation: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. S. Venkatesan, India Institute of Speech & Hearing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatima Umar Mani, Turai Umaru Yaradua Maternity and Children Hospital Katsina, Nigeria.

(2) Alagappan, Mahsa university, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Chaturbedi, MIMS-Manmohan Hospital, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatima Umar Mani, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alagappan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioaccumulation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon in Tympanotonos fuscatus and Crassostrea gasar from the upper reaches of the Bonny Estuary

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Efaishe Tweuhanga Angaleni Kavela, The Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Namibia.

(2) Rahul Kumar Singh, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adam Robisalmi, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia.

(2) Salahuddin, Amet University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Efaishe Tweuhanga Angaleni Kavela, Namibia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rahul Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Human Resource Capabilities and Business Performance of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Blessing Chidiebere Uwakwe, University of New Haven, United States of America.

(2) Rabin Subedi, Lincoln College, Nepal.

(3) Borislava Yordanova Alexandrova, Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abunda Joshua, University of Eastern Africa, Kenya.

(2) Biliamin Kehinde Abassm, Ikorodu Lagos State University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(3) Fidan Qerimi, AAB College, Kosovo.

(4) Peace Gabriel, Nigeria.

(5) Peter Oluyomi Alase, Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti (ABUAD), Nigeria.

(6) Sugin Raj M, Kristu Jayanti Deemed to be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Blessing Chidiebere Uwakwe, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rabin Subedi, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Borislava Yordanova Alexandrova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Three Different Distraction Techniques to Allay Dental Anxiety During La Procedures: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Izaz Shaik, Lakewood Family Dental IL, United States.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorsa Rahi, University of California, US.

(2) Saarika Suresh, Peoples Dental Academy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhumika  Patel, Howard University college of Dentistry, USA.

(2) K.Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

(3) kalpna Chaudhry, Seema dental college and hospital, India.

(4) Raghu K, Sri Balaji Vidhyapeeth, IGIDS, India.

(5) Shailee Anil Shelke, Arizona State University, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorsa Rahi, US) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saarika Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Constraints of Organic Farming Practices Adoption in Southern Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Federal Scientific Center of vegetable production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ado GARBA, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Neha Dwivedi, RVSKVV, Indore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ado GARBA, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Experimental study of biogas generation potential from human faeces in Warri, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gadang Priyotomo, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Babangida Alhaji Jinjiri, Mai Idris Alooma Polytechni, Nigeria.

(2) Kibet Tonui, Lake Region Economic Bloc, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Mahmood, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 ( Babangida Alhaji Jinjiri, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kibet Tonui, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Patient Satisfaction with Service Availability and Tangibility: A Comparison of Insured and Uninsured Patients at the National Hospital Abuja

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Carlos Humberto Martins, State University of Maringá, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghaliya Salah Al Atar, Oman College of Health Sciences, Oman.

(2) Mobereade Ayokanmi J, Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research Nigeria (CCCRN), Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Damilola Merotiwon, University of the Potomac, United States of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghaliya Salah Al Atar, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mobereade Ayokanmi J, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hemolytic Anemia Associated with Dapsone Therapy in Pemphigus Foliaceus: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Samia Hassan Rizk, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anuraj Mambazhathu Sudhakaran, Geisinger Medical Center, USA.

(2) Nhat Minh Huynh, Chulalongkorn University, Vietnam.

(3) Sai Ram Pachala, Osmania University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ascharya Chintalapati, JSS College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Mykola Zhelavskyi, Higher educational institution «Podillia State University», Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anuraj Mambazhathu Sudhakaran, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nhat Minh Huynh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sai Ram Pachala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Utilization of Plant-based Nutraceuticals for Optimizing Fish Reproduction in Aquaculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Dr. Momodu Jalloh,Eastern Technical University of Sierra Leone, Sierra Leone.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul B. Doronila, CENTRAL PHILIPPINES STATE UNIVERSITY, Philippines.

(2) Abhishek Giri, SAGE University, India.

(3) Wayan Kantun, Institute of Maritime Technology and Business, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aloke Saha, University of Kalyani, India.

(2) Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Vivian C. Peligro, Agusan del Sur State College of Agriculture and Technology, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paul B. Doronila, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Giri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wayan Kantun, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Preliminary Community-based Assessment of Water Sources and Prevalence of Waterborne Diseases in Giri, FCT Abuja, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab, Assiut University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Taiwo Temitope Bakare-Abidola, Georgia Southern University, United States of America.

(2) Victor Umar, Federal University Lokoja, Nigeria.

(3) Zainab A. Makawi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Taiwo Temitope Bakare-Abidola, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Victor Umar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zainab A. Makawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA