Peer Review History: Teachers’ Perceptions of the Concrete–Representational–Abstract Approach and GKA Math Kits in Improving Mathematical Skills among Primary School Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Wichien Ruboon, Burapha University, Thailand.

(2) Deviana, S.Pd., Institute Teknologi Dan Bisnis Stikom Bali, Indonesia.

(3) Mirela Macelaru, Medical School Osijek, Croatia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Damas Mkeli Mbosa, Lupanga Practicing Secondary school, Tanzania.

(2) Gozdegul Arık Karamık, Akdeniz Universitesi, Turkiye.

(3) Margaret Stevani, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Indonesia

(4) Ng Chee Hoe, Teacher Education Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wichien Ruboon, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deviana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mirela Macelaru, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Climate Change on Vegetable Production: Abiotic and Biotic Stresses, Adaptation and Management Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

(2) Moreira Martine Ramon Felipe, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Kareem, Mariam Olamide, New Mexico State University, United States.

(2) Sankov Petro, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology, Ukraine.

(3) Suganthi Kanagaraj, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ganjar Samudro, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

(2) Pijush Kanti Tripathi, Egra Sarada Sashi Bhusan College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kareem, Mariam Olamide, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sankov Petro, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suganthi Kanagaraj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Efficacy of Ocimum sanctum L. and anti-mastitis herbal paste on subclinical mastitis in cow in different housing systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Anamika, Shree Dev Bhoomi Institute of Education, Science & Technology, India.

(2) Pinkal Patel, Parul Institute of Pharmacy and Research, India.

(3) Anjali Kumari, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anamika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pinkal Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anjali Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Antibiotics Susceptibility Patterns of Bacterial Isolates Causing Adult Conjunctivitis among Patients Attending Tertiary Hospitals in Onitsha, Anambra State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahima Pant, Uttaranchal University, India.

(2) Ragul J S, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, India.

(3) Ujwala Shivaji Desai, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahmood Zeki Al-Hasso, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahima Pant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ragul J S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ujwala Shivaji Desai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Baseline Sensitivity Profiling of Alternaria mali Populations to Tebuconazole in Apple (Malus sp.), a Demethylation Inhibitor Fungicide

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Sevik, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Reviewers: 

(1) Ramchandra Suthar, Pramukh Swami Science & H D Patel Arts College, India.

(2) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

(3) Deshmukh Shivraj Jaysinha, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K Jyothirmai Madhavi, Dr YSR Horticultural University, India.

(2) Sonawane Bhimraj Natha, MES’s Arts, Commerce and Scicence College, India.

(3) Zinza Zakaria, Damascus University,B Syria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramchandra Suthar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deshmukh Shivraj Jaysinha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation and Characterization of Grape Pomace from Different Varieties for Functional Food Application

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Uttiya Jana, Jadavpur University, India.

(2) Sunandita Ghosh, Purdue University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) TIŢA Mihaela Adriana, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uttiya Jana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunandita Ghosh, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Nutritional Assessment of Finger Millet-Based Edible Cutlery Incorporated with Jaggery

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Tatjana Radosavljević, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ukoro Frank O., Federal Polytechnic Wanune (FPW), Nigeria.

(2) Sakshi Sharma, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sumbul Zehra, Galgotias University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ukoro Frank O., Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sakshi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Board Independence and Profitability of Listed Service Firms in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) V Ramakrishna, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, India.

(2) Y.Arul Sulochana, St.Joseph’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hedwigis Esti Riwayati, Perbanas Institute, Indonesia.

(2) Maheshkumar Maharudrappa, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, India.

(3) Sarishti Joshi, The ICFAI University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V Ramakrishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Y.Arul Sulochana, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Screening and Antioxidant Potential of Organic Extracts of the Leaves and Flowers of Lippia multiflora Mold from Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hao-Yang Wang,Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Joyce Nornubari Nzor, Gregory University Uturu, Nigeria.

(2) Satish S Meshram , Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enkuahone Abiyu Kassa, Debark University, Ethiopia.

(2) N. Rabita, Annamalai University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joyce Nornubari Nzor, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satish S Meshram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design and Development of an IoT-Enabled Smart Cultivation System for Sustainable Oyster Mushroom Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal Kumar, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) SHAKTIRANJAN DAS, VISVA-BHARATI UNIVERSITY, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishal Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (SHAKTIRANJAN DAS, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA