Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Category Archives: Review History
Peer Review History: Spectral Conditions for Norm-Attainment in Bounded Operators on Hilbert Spaces
Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Peer Review History: Spectral Conditions for Norm-Attainment in Bounded Operators on Hilbert Spaces
Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Peer Review History: Effect of Intercropping and Nutrient Management on Weed Control and Yield in Cassava Based Production Systems
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.
Reviewers:
(1) Duyu Monya, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.
(2) Yogesh Kumar, Bihar Agriculture University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Duyu Monya, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yogesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence and Management of Pear Psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola Foerster, Hemiptera, Psyllidae) in Kashmir, India
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.
Reviewers:
(1) Mawra Nadeem, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
(2) C. Selvaraj, India.
(3) Gyan Prakash Morya, Vital Biotech Research & Training Institute, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mawra Nadeem, Thailand) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Selvaraj, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gyan Prakash Morya, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Evaluation of Weed Management Effects through Regression Analysis in Black Gram
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.
Reviewers:
(1) Nikhil Digambar Solanke, Govt. College of Food Technology, India.
(2) Nagaraja O, KLE’S Jagadguru Tontadarya College, India.
(3) Sourabh Munnoli, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikhil Digambar Solanke, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagaraja O, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sourabh Munnoli, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Influence of Different Packing Materials on Quality Parameters of Jackfruit Based Blended Fruit Leasther during Storage
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.
Reviewers:
(1) Venkata Satish Kuchi, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.
(2) Mahesh Balasaheb Chougule, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkata Satish Kuchi, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Balasaheb Chougule, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Assessment of Biochemical and Physiological Traits of Native Spine Gourd (Momordica dioica Roxb.) Genotypes from the North-Eastern Region of India
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Greece.
Reviewers:
(1) Olatunji Bukola Funmilola, Nigeria.
(2) Manish Kumar Vijay, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research Institute, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Olatunji Bukola Funmilola, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar Vijay, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Key Challenges and Opportunities in Horticulture-Based Ecotourism Development in the Ulavapadu Region of Andhra Pradesh, India
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Reviewers:
(1) Krishna Kumar Verma, Central Universitry of Himachal Pradesh, India.
(2) Krishna D K, BAU Sabour, India.
(3) Mehtab Alam, National University of Science and Technology (NUST) Islamabad, Pakistan.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishna Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna D K, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehtab Alam, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Influence of Different Drying Methods on Proximate and Mineral Composition of Pea Pods
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Abu ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.
Reviewers:
(1) Emmanuel Kwaku Asamani, Sunyani Technical University, Ghana.
(2) Khairunnisa Atiqah Mohamad Khalid, Malaysia.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Kwaku Asamani, Ghana) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khairunnisa Atiqah Mohamad Khalid, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA