Peer Review History: Injectable Biomaterial Scaffolds for Post–Prostate Cancer Tissue Regeneration: Current Strategies and Future Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay, The Bhowanipur Education Society College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jacob Oche Attah, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) P. Usha Kiran, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) Safa Ahmed Abed, Al Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(4) Sunil Chaudhry, India.

(5) Hind Agourrame, Mohammed V University of Rabat, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harshlata chouhan, Jai Narain Vyas University, India.

(2) Arup Ratan Biswas, Techno India university, India.

(3) Jekson Martiar Siahaan, Institut Kesehatan Deli Husada, Indonesia.

(4) Manami Tanaka, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology and more Medical schools, Japan.

(5) Mehmet Gürcan, Istanbul University, Turkey.

(6) Numan Majeed, Qatif Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jacob Oche Attah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P. Usha Kiran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Safa Ahmed Abed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sunil Chaudhry, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Hind Agourrame, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Economics Textbooks on Students’ Performance in Tanzania National Examinations: A Pre-and Post-Introduction Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitești University Center, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Adyan Abdulmunim Mohammed, Iraq.

(2) Zaid Z, Makassar State University, Makassar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) John Kunga, MACHAKOS, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adyan Abdulmunim Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zaid Z, Makassar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: PHYTOTHERAPY IN CANCER PATIENTS: SURVEY CONDUCTED IN TWO HOSPITALS IN DAKAR (SENEGAL)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Gunasekar Manoharan, New Jersey Bio Science Centre, USA.

(2) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah University, Iraq.

(3) Niraj Gupta, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University (AKTU), India.

(4) Shital Phuse, Sant Gadagebaba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Madhukar Chavan, D Y Patil Agricultural and Technical University, India.

(2) Shahid Siddhik Attar, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(3) Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Mohstansaryah university, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.27/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gunasekar Manoharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zaizafoon Nabeel Nasif, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Niraj Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Shital Phuse, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Significance of Eosinophils in Acute Appendicitis: A comparative study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Reshma, Malla Reddy Medical College for Women, India.

(2) Birupaksha Biswas, The West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akhlak Hussain, Hadoti hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Reshma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Birupaksha Biswas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Audit 5.0 and the Digital Transformation of Auditing: The Role of Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Audit Quality and Decision-Making

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahtab Alam, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, India.

(2) Mahendran Chinnaiah, United States of America.

(3) Anil Mandloi, Barkatullah Vishwavidyalaya, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kenneth Besigomwe, Makerere University, Uganda.

(2) Sivaprasad Yerneni Khaga, University of New Haven, USA.

(3) Suresh Gangula, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahtab Alam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahendran Chinnaiah, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anil Mandloi, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Descriptive Review on BRICS Economy and Evolution of BRICS as Common Currency

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhusudhanan S, India.

(2) Emmanuel Eleje, University of Salford, United Kingdom.

(3) A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Moeed, Integral University, Lucknow, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhusudhanan S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emmanuel Eleje, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A.A.M.D. Amarasinghe, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Revolutionizing Root biomodification: SEM Insights into Glycolic Acid vs. EDTA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhannad Ali Kashmoola, Bilad Alrafidain University, Iraq.

(2) Vandana D, India.

(3) Archana R Sankar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kartik Sharma, India.

(2) Neha Rahul Sarda, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhannad Ali Kashmoola, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vandana D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Archana R Sankar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biologic and molecular integrative approach for the diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Abdelsamea Mohamedahmed, University of Gezira and Jerash university, Sudan and Jordan.

(2) Ashish S Uzgare, Wilson College (Autonomous), India.

(3) Fakeha Shaikh, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A K Dwivedi, DAV, Indore, India.

(2) Ibrahim, Jamilu, Sokoto State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Abdelsamea Mohamedahmed, Sudan and Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish S Uzgare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fakeha Shaikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Solpawa Bioremediation Solution in the Removal of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons from Oil-Based Drill Cuttings

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rachid Masrour, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali M. Galo, Iraq.

(2) Argha Modak, The University of Burdwan, India.

(3) Kenechukwu Ojiabo, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Nigeria.

(4) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D.Y. Patil, ACS College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali M. Galo, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Argha Modak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kenechukwu Ojiabo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Globalization in Silk Production: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Golubkina Nadezhda Alexandrovna, Federal Scientific Center of vegetable production, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nikas Nikhil Arun, Nagaland University, India.

(2) Nguyen Thuy Hanh, Vietnam Sericulture Research Center, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mariia Plotnikova, Polissia National University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nikas Nikhil Arun, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nguyen Thuy Hanh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA