Peer Review History: Multi-Environment Evaluation of Wheat Genotypes for Growth and Yield Attributes” in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Shanthi Palaniappan, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shanthi Palaniappan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Regional Dominance and Structural Transformation in Cucurbit Vegetables: A Two-Tier Analysis in Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Fernando José CebolaLidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyadarshani P Mohapatra, Central Agricultural University-Imphal, India.

(2) Prajith T. M, Sreekrishna College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyadarshani P Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prajith T. M,India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutritional Strategies for Enhancing Livestock Productivity- A review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Manish Pandey , ICAR-IARI, India.

(3) Marinela Enculescu, Research and Development Institute for Bovine Balotesti, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zirak M R Palani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marinela Enculescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Postural Analysis of Rural Women Involved in Vegetable Cultivation in Jorhat District of Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaibhavi Khatavkar (PT), Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth-College of Physiotherapy, India.

(2) Joseph Mailutha, Kisii University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaibhavi Khatavkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joseph Mailutha, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Atmospheric Response to India’s COVID-19 Lockdown: A Multi-Satellite Assessment of Aerosols, Trace Gases, and Meteorological Influences

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Amale Laaroussi, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

(2) Anthony Akande, The Ohio State University, United States.l

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sukanta Sarkar, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amale Laaroussi, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Akande, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating AI Influence on Candidate Authenticity: Risks, Ethics and Solutions for Modern Recruitment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Laxman Doddipatla, USA.

(2) Renebeth Gatudan Donguiz, Benguet State University (BSU), Philippines.

(3) Shankar Prasad Upadhyay, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bipin Kumar, Department of Economics, HNB Garhwal University, India.

(2) M. Geeta, K L University off campus, India.

(3) Vladimir Gorgadze, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Russia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laxman Doddipatla, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Renebeth Gatudan Donguiz, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shankar Prasad Upadhyay, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital and AI Tools for Conceptual Understanding: A Meta Synthesis of Digital Technology in Higher Mathematics Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bakare Kazeem Kayode, Albukhary International University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Alfi Rohmatul Azizah, Indonesia.

(2) Udobia Elijah Etukudo, Federal College of Education Technical, Rivers, State, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alfi Rohmatul Azizah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udobia Elijah Etukudo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Seasonal Variations in Cool and Warm Temperature Extremes in Chhattisgarh: A Pre- and Post-1986 Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Seemab Akhtar, National Institute of Advance Technology, Indian Institute of Science (Bengaluru), India.

(2) Salisu Lawal Halliru, Yusuf Maitama Sule Federal University of Education Kano, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Seemab Akhtar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Lawal Halliru, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) Approach in Teaching Science

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

(2) Dr. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Bingjie Wei, China.

(2) Suhazlan Bin Suhaimi, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bingjie Wei, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suhazlan Bin Suhaimi, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Use of Endoguide in access to a calcified upper canine: A case report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade And University Medical Center “Bezanijskakosa” Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Urvashi Bhimjibhai Sodvadia, Nova Southeastern University, United States.

(2) Ashima Agarwal, India.

(3) SURAJ GHANSHYAM MALPANI, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Urvashi Bhimjibhai Sodvadia, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashima Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (SURAJ GHANSHYAM MALPANI, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA