Peer Review History: Weather-Driven Dynamics of Rice Blast Disease in Kerala’s Lowland Rice Ecosystem

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nanik Setyowati, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuntala Kisan, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) V. Madhuri, ANGRAU, India.

(3) Fayinminu Akintade Ojo, Benue State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kuntala Kisan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Madhuri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fayinminu Akintade Ojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparison of Standard Triple Therapy and Non-Bismuth Concomitant Quadruple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Non-Ulcer Dyspepsia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Malik Olatunde Oduoye, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Amged Ameen Mohammed Abdelhakeem, University of Dongola, Sudan.

(3) Reema Ghani, Mian Rashid Hussain Memorial Hospita, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohmmd Abdullha, CCRUM, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malik Olatunde Oduoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amged Ameen Mohammed Abdelhakeem,  Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Reema Ghani, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Oral Conditions among Patients in Intensive Care Units in the Port Region of Baixada Santista, SP, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla-Raygoza,  Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Mohsin Haider, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(2) Kaveri G.S., Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, India.

(3) Agnes Valencia-Raymundo, Manila Central University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajprakash Bhaskaran, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, India.

(2) Tanuja.B, Dr.NTR University Of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Mohsin Haider, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kaveri G.S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Agnes Valencia-Raymundo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emergence of Riemerella anatipestifer Infection in Domestic Ducks in Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep M, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Adriana Amfim, Spiru Haret University, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mary Aricha Yakubu, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

(2) Nayanmoni Konwar, Nagaon Medical College and Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adriana Amfim, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Genetic Variability, GCV and PCV in F₁ and F₂ Populations of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Harshal E. Patil, Navsari Agricultural University, INDIA.

(2) Francisco Gordillo, Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Mexico.

(3) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syed Sikandar Shah, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, UAE.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harshal E. Patil, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Francisco Gordillo, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Murugaragavan Ramasamy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing the Relative Importance of Factors Influencing Farm Women Empowerment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabita Mondal, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Naveed Farah, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chanate Ratanaubol, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sabita Mondal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naveed Farah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on Canine Ehrlichiosis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Anjaneyulu Vinukonda, Strides Pharma Inc., USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Melkamu Melese Megalo, Ethiopia.

(2) G.Kalaiselvi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ebrahim Abbasi, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Israa Najm Abdullah Al-Ibadi, University Of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Melkamu Melese Megalo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G.Kalaiselvi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dynamics of Ralstonia solanacearum species complex as influenced by soil ecology

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sheeba Menon, K K Shah Jarodwala Maninagar Science College, India.

(2) Mekidani Jacob Salu, University of Georgia, The United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Rekha, Bishop Heber College, India.

(2) Manica Tomar, Dr. Y.S Parmar University Of Horticulture And Forestry, India.

(3) Sheeba Menon, K K Shah Jarodwala Maninagar Science college, India.

(4) Supriya Mondal, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sheeba Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mekidani Jacob Salu, The United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Technical Employment Preparedness of Grade 12 ICT Students Specializing in Computer Systems Servicing

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mirela Macelaru, Medical school Osijek, Croatia.

(2) Muhammad Asim Khan, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dennis g. Caballes, Olivarez College Paranaque, Philippines.

(2) Kenneth m. Sabwami, Mount Kenya Unversity, Kenya.

(3) Seyed Alireza khezri, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mirela Macelaru, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Asim Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field and Multi-locational Study on Efficacy of Native Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar) against Termite (Odontotermes obesus Rambur) in Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Izbasar Isataevich Temreshev, LLP Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Plant Protection and Quarantine, Republic Kazakhstan.

(2) Endang Nurcahyani, M.Si, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Shamkhi Jabbar, AL-Qadisiyah University, Iraq.

(2) Seyed Mostafa Emadi Baladehi, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Izbasar Isataevich Temreshev, Republic Kazakhstan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Endang Nurcahyani, M.Si, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA