Editor(s):

(1) Dr. SungCheal Moon, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Republic of Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Shabana Palyam, Sanskrithi School Of Engineering, India.

(2) B.Karpagam, St. Michael College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(3) Md. Motahar Hossain, Rajshahi University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shabana Palyam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.Karpagam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md. Motahar Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Utkarsh Ghate, India.

(2) S.P. Anand, National College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Utkarsh Ghate, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.P. Anand, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 4 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 5 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 6 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Sonia Maria Dos Santos Leite Ruao Pinheiro Harry Leite, Polytechnic Institute of Maia, Portugal.

(2) Jimmy Adora Nebrida, Bahrain Polytechnic, Bahrain/Philippines.

(3) Laxman Prasad Bhandari, Lumbini Banijya Campus, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sonia Maria Dos Santos Leite Ruao Pinheiro Harry Leite, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jimmy Adora Nebrida, Bahrain/Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Laxman Prasad Bhandari, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Nomasonto Mthembu, North-West University, South Africa.

(2) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nomasonto Mthembu, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(2) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Eliand Rey C. Soliman, La Consolacion College Bacolod, Philippines.

(2) Papadatu Carmen-Penelopi, “Dunarea de Jos” University from Galati, Romania.

(3) Diwakar Dhondu Kadam, D G Tatkare Arts and Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eliand Rey C. Soliman, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Papadatu Carmen-Penelopi, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Diwakar Dhondu Kadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Government of Assam, India.

Reviewers:

(1) K S S Kanhaiya, India.

(2) Niraj Kumar, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(3) Ridha Slaimi, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K S S Kanhaiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ridha Slaimi, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ganesh S Kahar, India.

(2) Anindita Deb Pal, J.D. Birla Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ganesh S Kahar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anindita Deb Pal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

(2) Manisha Thakur, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waikhom Jupiter Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) V.Jothi Francina, Sona College of Technology, India.

(2) A Sangamithra, Bharathiar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.Jothi Francina, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A Sangamithra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.

(2) Iman Ben Hamza, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iman Ben Hamza, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA