Peer Review History: Numerical Investigation of Thermal and Hydraulic Performance for Grid-Type Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers: A Comparative Study of U-Type and Z-Type Configurations

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Pharos University. Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Suresh D. Mane, Dr D Y Patil Pratisthans College of Engineering, India.

(2) Ganesh, BIET Hyderabad, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C.C. Hong, Hsiuping University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Kondhalkar Ganesh Eknath, Anantrao Pawar College of Engineering & Research, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(3) Mohd. Asif Gandhi, University of Mumbai, India.

(4) Sohail Bux, RKDF University, India.

(5) Soumaila Camara, Polytechnic Rural Institute of Training and Applied Research (IPR/IFRA), Mali.

(6) Sushil Kumar Singh, Vivekananda College of Technology & Management, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suresh D. Mane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI) of Selected Roadside Plant Species in Urban Environments of Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Simon Stephen Mshelia, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

(2) Hermes Ulises Ramirez Sanchez, Universidad de Guadalajara, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jayakiran Reddy E, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simon Stephen Mshelia, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hermes Ulises Ramirez Sanchez, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Abiotic Factors on the Occurrence of Mustard Aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) L. Gopianand, PAJANCOA&RI, India.

(2) Sheetal Kumawat, SKNAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prince Sahu, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Agriculture Sciences, India.

(2) Ramdas R. Kamdi, Anand Niketan College, Gondwana University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (L. Gopianand, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sheetal Kumawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sensitivity of Crop Water Footprints to Planting Dates and Temperature in the Middle Indo-Gangetic Plains, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Kaviya, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Prosper Nkala, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sreerama Naik S R, Kannur University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Kaviya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prosper Nkala, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Whey Powder Enriched Chocolate

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed, Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Giza, Egypt.

(2) Mustafa Adnan Idan, University of Misan, Iraq.

(3) Turcu Simona Laura, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Silviya Ivanova, Institute of Cryobiology and Food Technology, Bulgaria.

(2) Aditya, NIFTEM-K , An Institute of National Importance of India, India.

(3) BELLO Monsurat, Adeyemi Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(4) Katke S.D., MIT College of Food Technology, India.

(5) Nikhil Solanke, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, India.

(6) Silviya Ivanova, Institute of Cryobiology and Food Technology, Bulgaria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mustafa Adnan Idan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Turcu Simona Laura, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Breeding Techniques of Orchids, Role of Tissue Culture and Micropropagation in Mass Cultivation and its Ecological Importance: A review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Indra Fardhani, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

(2) Shiwali Bisht, Motherhood University, India.

(3) Krishnaveni Iyengar, R.T.M.Nagpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akpa Amona Adah, Nasarawa State University, Nigeria.

(2) Indra Fardhani, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

(3) Mazin Hasan Raheema, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Indra Fardhani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiwali Bisht, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Krishnaveni Iyengar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AMELIORATIVE AND PROTECTIVE POTENTIAL OF ELAEIS GUINEENSIS ON THE SMALL INTESTINE OF ADULT MICE EXPOSED TO DIAZEPAM TOXICITY

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Himanshu Mishra, Amity University, India.

(2) Jyoti G. Jain, RGUHS, India.

(3) G Sivakumar, The Tamilnadu Dr. MGR Medical University, India.

(4) G.U.A. Kumara, Gampaha Wickramarachchi University of Indigenous Medicine, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himanshu Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jyoti G. Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (G Sivakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (G.U.A. Kumara, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Species Isolated in HIV Patients with Oropharyngeal Candidiasis, in Gabon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Sasikala, Dr. N.G.P Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Lalit Samant, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, India.

(3) Suhair  M. Yaseen, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Sasikala, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lalit Samant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suhair  M. Yaseen, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) Regarding Insulin Use among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anjalee G. Ovhal, Jaipur National University Institute for Medical Sciences and Research Centre, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Kumar Sahoo, Dhenkanal Autonomous College, India.

(2) Ahajumobi Nwadiohamma Edith, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Meesa Madhavi, Vaagdevi college of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Mohammad Bakhriansyah, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prakash Kumar Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahajumobi Nwadiohamma Edith, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Student Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Antimicrobial Resistance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S., All India Institutes of Medical Sciences,India.

(2) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashly Merin George, Mvm College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) GN Manjunath, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, India.

(3) R. Sargunapathi, The Gandhigram Rural Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashly Merin George, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (GN Manjunath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R. Sargunapathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA