Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hüseyin CÜCE, Faculty of Engineering,Giresun University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Debabrata Das, Lalgarh Govt. College, India.

(2) Theophilus Deenadayal, Bharatiya Engineering Science and Technology Innovation University (BESTIU), India.

(3) Pablo G. Rimoldi, Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR), Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhausaheb Tambat, UAS, GKVK, India.

(2) Marilena Onete, Institute of Biology Bucharest of the Romanian Academy, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debabrata Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theophilus Deenadayal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pablo G. Rimoldi, Argentina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Kenneth Besigomwe, Makerere University, Uganda.

(2) Carl Jay P. Diamante, College of Maritime Education, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ferencz Irma, Aprily Lajos National College, Romania.

(2) Mylene a. Bautista, Sti West Negros University, Philippines.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carl Jay P. Diamante, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Chaudhari, MGM Institute of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Pinnawalage Harshani Avanthika Pinnawala, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gayatri Moharana, India.

(2) Kalayu Mebrahtu Kiros, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.

(3) Karthika Devi, Kalasalingam University, India.

(4) Ritu Kumari Sureka, University of Allahabad, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Chaudhari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pinnawalage Harshani Avanthika Pinnawala, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Chiara Imperato, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D’Aragona”, Salerno, Italy.

(2) Archana K Acharya, SCB Medical College, India.

(3) Padavala Kranthi Kumar, Mk Diagnostics and Research Laboratory, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Callirroi G. Augustatou, NHS, Greece.

(2) Gholam-Reza Bateni, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran.

(3) Inneke Kusumawati Susanto, Krida Wacana Christian University (UKRIDA), Indonesia.

(4) Jonathan Gebechukwu Areji, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States.

(5) Sherien Abdelwahab Montaser, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Chiara Imperato, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana K Acharya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Padavala Kranthi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. A. Vijaya Anand, Bharathiar University Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Victoria Kshetrimayum, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), India.

(2) O S Aysha, Thassim Beevi Abdul Kader College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syed Awais Hussain Shah, University of Kotli, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Victoria Kshetrimayum, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (O S Aysha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics,  China.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluwaseun Adetarami, Federal University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Onuoha, Victor Wemimo, National Horticultural Research Institute/University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amal George, Vels University Chennai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluwaseun Adetarami, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Onuoha, Victor Wemimo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Salam, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Afifa Talpur, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) YunusArifien, Nusa Bangsa University, Indonesia.

(2) Daniyal Hussain, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(3) Mohamed Rashad Gouda Youssif, Food Technology Research Institute – Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kosasih, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(2) RATA Mohamed, Djillali Bounaama University of Khemis Miliana, Algeria.

(3) V.N.Meena Devi, Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education, India.

(4) Vishal Vilasrao Naiknaware, Swa. Sawarkar Mahavidhyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (YunusArifien, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniyal Hussain, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohamed Rashad Gouda Youssif, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Mama Julius, Institute of Agriculture,Business and Capacity Building (IABC), Uganda.

(2) Rasha Ahmed Hashim, Universityof Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mama Julius, Uganda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rasha Ahmed Hashim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Ashok, Marshall Uniersity, USA.

(2) Janani P R, Padmavani Arts and Science College For Women, India.

(3) S.Vimala Gandhi, Bangalore City College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pragya Kulkarni, Govt. V.Y.T. PG Autonomous College, India.

(2) Saswati Gayen, Vijaygarh Jyotish Ray College, University of Calcutta, India.

(3) Yuliya Tyravska, Bogomolets National Medical University, Ukraine.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Ashok, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Janani P R, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.Vimala Gandhi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA