Peer Review History: Leveraging Anthropocene Indian Disasters with Python

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Suraj Kalgonda Patil, DKTEs Textile & Engineering Institute, India.

(2) Ajun Purwanto, PGRI Pontianak University, Indonesia.

(3) Pushpa Mahapatro, Vidyalankar School of Information Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) El Hachmi Driss, Rabat Mohammed V University, Morrocco.

(2) Jovany gleen l. Allawan, University Of Mindanao-Panabo College, Philippines.

(3) Mulambwa Mwanang’ono, University of Lusaka, Zambia.

(4) Zbiri Asmae, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suraj Kalgonda Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajun Purwanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pushpa Mahapatro, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Irrigation Scheduling and Foliar Application of Phosphorus, Sulphur, and Boron on the Growth Characteristics of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Catherine Mueni Peter, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

(2) Ajmal Siddique S, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hemant Kumar Gupta, SAGE University, India.

(2) Sachin S Chinchorkar, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Catherine Mueni Peter, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajmal Siddique S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on the Effect of Seed Biopriming with MPKV Bacterial Consortium on Growth and Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Aashish Gyawali, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Lui Wing Kin, Gordon University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asad Ali Khan, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Mohammed Bukar Aji, Modibbo Adama University Yola Adamawa State, Nigeria.

(3) Suherman, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aashish Gyawali, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lui Wing Kin, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review on the Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Potential of Lavandula mairei Humbert: An Endemic Moroccan Species

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampath Gouru, Aura Biosciences Inc, United States of America.

(2) Charulata Tushar Nemade, Maratha Vidya Prasark College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Kar, India.

(2) Santhosh Illendula, Vijaya College Of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampath Gouru, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Charulata Tushar Nemade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of enriched biochar on hardening of banana tissue culture plantlets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Kumar Jangid, India.

(2) Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Shreya Modi, Gandhinagar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.E.Vivekanandan, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

(2) Osama Taha Bahnas, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit Kumar Jangid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seyyed Akbar Sadaty, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shreya Modi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Local Aromatic Plant Marinades and Cooking Regimes on Color Kinetics and Quality of Borgou Cattle Meat in Benin

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ng Zhi Xiang, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandan Kumar, SSNRKS College, B.N. Mandal University, India.

(2) K. Sudheer, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(3) Chandan Kumar, U.P. Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu-Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Misde Yola, Politecnic Ministry Of Health Jakarta 2, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Sudheer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chandan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Web 2.0 Technologies in Political Science Instruction for Boosting Students’ Problem-Solving Skills

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Laxmikant Balaji Pensalwar, Maharashtra Udayagiri Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Rinki Khatun, Apex Teachers’ Training College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prakash H S, Hasanamba College of Education, India.

(2) Reza Aghanouri, Shahid Beheshti University Of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laxmikant Balaji Pensalwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rinki Khatun, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-Driven Adversarial Defense Framework with Generative Adversarial Network for Secure Healthcare IoT Ecosystems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Niranjan Mohapatra, Academy World Skill Center, India.

(2) Pranesh Kulkarni, T.John Institute of Technology Bangalore, India.

(3) Rahul Shaw, Alliance University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christian Chukwuemeka Nzeanorue, George Washington University, United States.

(2) R.  Jayasree, Avinashilingam University for Women, India.

(3) Rakibul Hasan Chowdhury, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niranjan Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pranesh Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rahul Shaw, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Three Species of Stock Fish Sold in Port Harcourt Market of Rivers State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Brij Bhushan Tewari, University of Guyana, Guyana.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Awulu, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

(2) Ahmad Baihaqi Bin Othman, Fisheries Research Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Rana, Lovely Professional University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Awulu, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Baihaqi Bin Othman, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Public Transportation and Urban Tourism Transformation: A Case Study of Pantai Indah Kapuk (PIK) Jakarta

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ha Van Trung, Wuhan University, Vietnam.

(2) Hari Prasad Ghimire, Nepal.

(3) Nassar Ahmed, University of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Azim Salahi Kojour, Shafagh Tonekabon Institute of Higher Education, Iran.

(2) Dattatraya Vilas Harpale, Gokhale Education Society, HPT Arts & RYK Science College Nashik (1) Maharashtra, India.

(3) Saroop Roy B. R, Kerala Institute of Tourism and Travel Studies (KITTS), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ha Van Trung, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hari Prasad Ghimire, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nassar Ahmed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA