Peer Review History: Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Leading Cause of Female Infertility

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Novalia Kridayanti, Prof. Dr. Hafiz MPH University, Indonesia.

(2) Prabhanshu Gupta, Bharati Vidhyapeeth College of Ayurved, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abbas Fadhil Khudhur, Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) A. Vijayalakshmi, Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Novalia Kridayanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabhanshu Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Upland Rice–soybean Intercropping for Enhanced Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, and Farmer Income

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tasawar Iqbal, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Kanik Kumar Bansal, Guru Kashi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Anil Shahane, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) B. Subhash, Lovely Professional University, India.

(3) K.Sathish Babu, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(4) Mandaloju Venkateshwarlu, UASC Kakatiya University Warangal, India.

(5) Mohammad Halim Khan, Atarra Post Graduate College Atarra, Bundelkhand University, India.

(6) N Sabitha, ANGRAU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tasawar Iqbal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanik Kumar Bansal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soilless Farming: A Method to Produce Quality Vegetables

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S., Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ştefan Ţălu, The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Rohini T V, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ştefan Ţălu, Romania | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rohini T V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Consumption Pattern of Millets among Urban Women in Ludhiana and S.A.S Nagar, Districts of Punjab

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Talwinder S. Kahlon, Western Regional Research Center, USA.

(2) N’DA Hugues Annicet, National Center for Agricultural Research, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mustafizur Rahman, SCS College of Agriculture, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Talwinder S. Kahlon, Western Regional Research Center, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Talwinder S. Kahlon, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N’DA Hugues Annicet, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hematological Parameters of One-Year-Old (Fingerlings) Carp Fish

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumbul Zehra, Galgotias University, India.

(2) Jemimah Ayuma Simbauni, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajaykumar Soma Kolhe, SES’s Arts And Science College, KBC North Maharashtra University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumbul Zehra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jemimah Ayuma Simbauni, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Matrix Methods for Connectivity and Reachability in Transportation Networks

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Narendra Kumar Kurre, Atsl Bihari Vajpayee University Bilaspur, India.

(2) Patriciu Alina-Mihaela, Dunărea de Jos University of Galați, Romania.

(3) P. Sri Ram Chandra, Aditya University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Recharla, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Narendra Kumar Kurre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Patriciu Alina-Mihaela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (P. Sri Ram Chandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Irrigation Water Quality in the Experimental Farm of Tiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjeev Kumar, Graphic Era (Deemed to be) University, India.

(2) R. Jebakumar, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dunia Bahel Gadaan Al-Ghanimy, Al-Qadisiyah University, Iraq.

(2) Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Laikipia University, Kenya.

(3) Oraby Hussein, Menoufia University, Egypt.

(4) R.Prem Sudha, Akshaya College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Jebakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Changing Pattern and Profile of Paediatric Intussusception in Benin City, Nigeria: A Five-year Retrospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Al-Zahrawi University, Iraq.

(2) Maliha Muzaffer, Mesco College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kambire Jean Luc, Université Yembila Abdoulaye Toguyeni, Burkina Faso.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasanain Abdulhameed Odhar, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maliha Muzaffer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fear of Reporting and Sanction: Its Influence to Clinical Performance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Manipal college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammmad Danish, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Safdar Baig, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

(3) Mathanki Sutharsan, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hina pervaiz, The university of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammmad Danish, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Safdar Baig, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mathanki Sutharsan, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association between Screen Time and SCRAM (Sleep, Circadian Rhythm, and Mood) among Student Nurses: A Descriptive Correlational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Manipal college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudipta Nandi, India.

(2) Brijesh Kumar Verma, BBD LUCKNOW, India.

(3) Joy Oluwatoyin Oladejo, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(4) K Bhuvaneswari, Guru Nanak College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa  Elsayed  Fathi  Abdou, Memorial Institute  of Ophthalmic Researches, Egypt.

(2) B.Manovijay, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankarachariyar Dental college, India.

(3) Divyashree Mohapatra, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(4) Florence Nassimbwa, Uganda Martyrs University, Uganda.

(5) Margaret Chan Kit Yok, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

(6) Md Intekhabur Rahman, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, India.

(7) Victorița Trif, University of Bucharest, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudipta Nandi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Brijesh Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Joy Oluwatoyin Oladejo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (K Bhuvaneswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA