Peer Review History: Qualitative Assessment of Growth Utilization of Crude Oil by Genetically Modified Non-Crude Oil-Degrading Refinery Effluent Indigenous Bacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Mehdi Razzaghi-Abyaneh, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) IKHUMETSE, Agatha Abamhekhelu, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Eram Ayaz, Barkatullah University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Padma Vathi, Ch.S.D.St. Theresa’s College For Women(A), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (IKHUMETSE, Agatha Abamhekhelu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eram Ayaz, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Garland Market and Adoption to Technology Innovations in Hyderabad City, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Rita Narwariya, India.

(2) Georgia Koutouzidou, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atiya Maqbool, University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir SKUAST-K, India.

(2) Hene l. Hapinat, Northern Iloilo State University-Batad Campus, Philippines.

(3) Kamal Dev, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India.

(4) Kousik Boro, Bodoland University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rita Narwariya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Georgia Koutouzidou, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation and Path Analysis for Yield and Its Contributing Traits in Summer Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Saritha Pendlikatla , India.

(3) Batiseba Tembo, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eusebio Benique Olivera, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano, Puno-Perú.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saritha Pendlikatla , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Batiseba Tembo, Zambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Varietal and Location Effects on Growth, Yield and Economics of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanik Kumar Bansal, Guru Kashi University, India.

(2) Jasin Rahman VK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cardei Petru, Romania.

(2) Lokesh Ramachandran, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Njoku Isaac Saint, Caleb University, Nigeria.

(4) Ragul S, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(5) Shivam Singh, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kanik Kumar Bansal , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasin Rahman VK, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth Performance and Soil Fertility Dynamics in Nutrient Managed Acacia auriculiformis Based Silvipastoral System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bonface O. Manono, Colorado State University, USA and South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Alok Singh Bargah, India.

(2) Surendra Kumar Verma, Rajmata Vijyaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alok Singh Bargah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Surendra Kumar Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnopharmacological Study of Plants Used against Malaria by Traditional Healers in the District of Dikodougou, North Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) S V Hiremath, P C Jabin Science College, India.

(2) Ajay Kumar Srivastava, St Xavier’s College, India.

(3) Dawoye Yusufu, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria.

(4) Darika Bunphan, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daini Tolulope Grace, Ogun State College Of Health Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Mohua Biswas, Dharanidhar Medical College and hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S V Hiremath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Kumar Srivastava, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dawoye Yusufu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Darika Bunphan, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unusual Mandibular Incisive Canal Behind the Curtain of Periapical Radiolucency Using a CBCT-Assisted Diagnostic Approach: A Case Report and Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Haritma Nigam, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College & Research Centre, India.

(2) Yahya H. Y. Alfarra, University of Ottawa, Canada.

(3) Veeresh M, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haritma Nigam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yahya H. Y. Alfarra, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Veeresh M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Assessment of Bio-agents and their Culture Filtrate for Sustainable Management of Rhizoctonia solani

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Mahtab Rashid, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Urja H Bhimani, Indian Institute of Groundnut Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aslı şalcıoğlu, Koç Universty, Türkiye.

(2) Bhukya Srinivas, Professor JayaShankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(3) Niranjan Chinara, OUAT, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Mahtab Rashid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Urja H Bhimani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of DSSAT CROPGRO Model on Growth and Yield of Pigeonpea Cultivars under Different Sowing Windows

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Hemanshukumar Jekishandas Maisuria, Gujarat Biotechnology Research Center, India.

(2) Mekuanint Tadilo Tefera, Bahir Dar university, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Greena P G, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hemanshukumar Jekishandas Maisuria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mekuanint Tadilo Tefera, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ice Melt as a Means to Assess Earth’s Heat Budget Imbalance and Climate Changes from the Last Glaciation to the Inevitable Next One

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Cornelius K, R.M.K. College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Pragalbh Tiwari, SHUATS, India.

(3) Mehvish Majeed, University of Nevada, Reno, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Pandey, India.

(2) Elijah W Chindia, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

(3) Hany Mostafa, Egypt.

(4) Marko Vidnjevič, China.

(5) Muzafaruddin Chachar, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(6) Shatha Hazim AL-Zakar, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(7) Shreya Anand, Mizoram University, India.

(8) Yogesh Shreekrushna Shete, JSPM University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cornelius K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pragalbh Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehvish Majeed, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA