Peer Review History: REVERSE MIGRATION DURING COVID 19 PANDEMIC: A REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aditi R Khandelwal, Associate Professor, IIS (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(3) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei”  University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Arbind Chaudhary, Nepal.

(2) Samit Mahore, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

(3) Anuja Sharma, Amity University, India.

(4) Arup Mitra, South Asian University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arbind Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samit Mahore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anuja Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arup Mitra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: EFFECTS OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF VARIOUS FORMULATIONS OF COCOYAM-BAMBARA GROUNDNUT-SOYA BEAN FLOUR BLENDS ON THE SERUM LIPIDS & INFLAMMATORY BIOMARKERS OF STREPTOZOTOCIN-INDUCED DIABETIC RATS.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Dintu K P, Fatima Mata National College, India.

(2) Sanyogita Shahi, Kalinga University, India.

(3) S S Sreenivas, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dintu K P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanyogita Shahi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S S Sreenivas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Method of Natural Product Isolation: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Dr. Tapanee Hongratanaworakit, Associate Professor, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhananjay Pandey, Govt. Naveen Girls College, India.

(2) Samia, Tianjin University, China.

(3) Khizra Ashraf, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhananjay Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samia, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Khizra Ashraf, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Income Sufficiency Assessment of Rural Households of Malda District in West Bengal

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamran Ali Abbasi, Shah Abdul Latif University, Pakistan.

(2) Nicholas Bamegne Nambie, Valley View University, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamran Ali Abbasi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nicholas Bamegne Nambie, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Relationship between the Personal Traits of the Respondents with Their Knowledge and Attitude towards the Use of KCC

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Anju John, REVA University, India.

(2) Salisu Audu Baba, School of Undergraduate, College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anju John, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Chitosan Fortified Briquettes and Nano Urea Formulations on Growth, Yield and Biochemical Parameters of Sweet Corn (Zea mays saccharata L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) H S Behera, Lovely Professional University, India.

(2) Ramesh Kumar Kushwaha, Reva University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (H S Behera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramesh Kumar Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application and recent trends of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture: A brief review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bello R. S, Federal College of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Albina Amin, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bello R. S, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Albina Amin, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: BIO EFFICACY OF EMAMECTIN BENZOATE 5 SG AND 1.9 EC AGAINST SHOOT AND FRUIT BORERS OF OKRA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nishigandha Ranasingh, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Sikha O’ Anusadhan, India.

(2) Naveen Gaurav, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nishigandha Ranasingh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Naveen Gaurav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Variability and Character Association Studies in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) for Seed Yield and its Contributing Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Abate Dawud, Samara University, Ethiopia.

(2) Dugasa Alemu Aga, Mattu University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Abate Dawud, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dugasa Alemu Aga, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hemoglobin Phenotype Variants Among Voluntary Blood Donors at Lagos State Blood Transfusion Service.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Juan Carlos Troiano, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Monalisha Saikia Borah, Gauhati Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Safia Mehmood Khan, National Institute of Blood Disease and Bone Marrow Transplant, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monalisha Saikia Borah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Safia Mehmood Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA