Category Archives: Uncategorized

Peer Review History: Review of Characterization and Testing Methods for the Mechanical, Microstructure, Pore, Permeability and Freeze-Thaw Properties of Porous Concrete

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. D.B. Jani, Gujarat Technological University, GTU, Ahmedabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooria Kianoush, Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Iran.

(2) Lindelwa Siwisa, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Israa Rahman Ghanim, Iraq.

(2) Mohammad Hossain Jalal Kamali, University of Gonabad, Iran.

(3) Patel Dixitkumar Bharatbhai, Silver Oak University, India.

(4) Pooria Kianoush, Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooria Kianoush, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lindelwa Siwisa, South Africa) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Benefits and Economic Feasibility of Tourism Investment Klothok Beach, Wonogiri, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia: A Descriptive Quantitative Study

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Habumuremyi Faustin, Rwanda Polytechnic, Rwanda.

(2) Dimas Tri Rendra Graha, Sagamartha Ultima Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) Ayu Anggraini Tambunan, Universitas Amal Ilmiah Yapis Wamena, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Habumuremyi Faustin, Rwanda) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dimas Tri Rendra Graha, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ayu Anggraini Tambunan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: On-demand AI-driven Predictive Analysis: Bridging the Gap for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bojan Durin, University North, Varaždin, Croatia.

(2) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Dorcas Oyebode, Purdue University Northwest, USA.

(2) Chijioke Agupugo, Appalachian State University, USA.

(3) Dragana Knezevic, Western Serbia Academy of Applied Studies, Serbia.

(4) J.Jasmine Christina Magdalene, Bishop Heber College Tiruchirappalli, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dorcas Oyebode, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chijioke Agupugo, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dragana Knezevic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (J.Jasmine Christina Magdalene, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Effects of Foliar Boron on the Growth and Yield of Maize

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Husam Mohammed Muhi, University of Diyala, Iraq.

(2) Saddam Hakeem Cheyed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Husam Mohammed Muhi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saddam Hakeem Cheyed, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Brief Study on Heterosis in Indian Brinjal for Horticultural Traits

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

(2) Prof. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Zeki KARİPÇİN, Siirt University, Türkiye.

(2) Shraddha Karcho, JNKVV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Zeki KARİPÇİN, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shraddha Karcho, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Correlation between Dietary Patterns and Anaemia among Adolescent Girls of Kolam Tribe

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Tri Siswati, Indonesia.

(2) Shrikant, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tri Siswati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shrikant, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: The Impact of Multicultural Education on Student Performance: Examining Ethnicity, Ideology and Teacher Perceptions

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Bimal Kishore Shrivastwa, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Margaret Stevani, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) Austin Onyebuchi, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bolutife Oluwadele, Canada.

(2) Elazar Ben-Lulu, Ariel University, Israel.

(3) Heather L. Moulton, Central Arizona College and Prescott College, Arizona.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bimal Kishore Shrivastwa, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Margaret Stevani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Austin Onyebuchi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review Report_1_v1 (Bimal Kishore Shrivastwa, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review Report_2_v1 (Margaret Stevani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Dates and Varieties on Growth and Yield Attributes of Field Pea (Pisum sativum) under Different Micro-environment

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Melucă Cristina, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Melucă Cristina, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA