Peer Review History: Coccinellids of Some Cropping Fields of Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna,V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Soumik Dey Roy, Brainware University, India.

(2) Jafar Mehdi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahasan Ullah Khan, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Magda Mahmoud Amin Sabbour, National research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Telly Yarita Macías Zambrano, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soumik Dey Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jafar Mehdi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diversity of insect pests and their natural enemies in lowland rice agroecosystem of Nagaland.

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharat Lal, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(2) Samane Yari, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kouadjo Claude Ghislaine, National Center for Agronomic Research, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharat Lal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samane Yari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1(Samane Yari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Piriformospora indica: A Helper Endophytic Fungus in Enhancing Growth and Nutrient Status in Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh,Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shama Afroze Baig, Swami Shri Swaroopanand Saraswati Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Shubha Jagannath, Bangalore University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shama Afroze Baig, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubha Jagannath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Dioscorea persimilis Yield in Thai Nguyen through Improved Cultivation Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Masimba Tapera, Gwanda State University, Zimbabwe.

(2) Prajya Arya, Institute of Good Manufacturing Practice India, India.

(3) Sowndarya Karapareddy, Alabama A&M University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Masimba Tapera, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prajya Arya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sowndarya Karapareddy, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: SINUSOIDAL OBSTRUCTION SYNDROME FOLLOWING CAPEOX IN COLORECTAL CANCER: A DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Anahi Gonzalez Mercado, University of Guadalajara, Mexico.

(2) Shaima K A, Chitkara University, India.

(3) Kelly Osayi Otakhor, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nicola Sarandria, Italy.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anahi Gonzalez Mercado, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shaima K A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kelly Osayi Otakhor, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimating the Economic Value of Water Supply Function of Forests Using the Contingent Valuation Method: The Case of Karabük Yenice Forests, Türkiye

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Satrio Budi Prakoso, Ehime University, Japan.

(2) Ngoc Trinh M., VNU Hanoi University of Science, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satrio Budi Prakoso, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ngoc Trinh M.,Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pocket Guide for Effective Maternal Death Audit

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipti Das, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), India.

(2) Pratiwi Ramlan, Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang University, Indonesia.

(3) Palmer Henry Obakpororo, Federal Medical Centre, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Qasim Abbas Khyoosh Al-Eqabi, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dipti Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratiwi Ramlan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Palmer Henry Obakpororo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Improving Rice Yield in Saline Soils: The Role of Salicylic Acid in Mitigating Stress

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Oğuz Dolgun, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Basant Kumar Dadarwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

(2) BIDAI Yasmina, Oran 1 University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Basant Kumar Dadarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (BIDAI Yasmina, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: DECODING FENUGREEK’S CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING MECHANISM: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ITS THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Firouzeh Dehghan, University of Tehran, Iran.

(2) Priya Patel, Saurashtra University, India.

(3) Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, UCT ,Osmania University , India .

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firouzeh Dehghan, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priya Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Konatham Teja Kumar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Evaluation of Ready-to-Eat Flakes from Malted Yellow Maize, Defatted Groundnut and Sweet Orange Peel Composite Flour Blends

Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.
(2) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok, Thailand.

Reviewers:
(1) Sana Jhansi Reddy, India.
(2) Bambang Kunarto, Semarang University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pulipati Sowjanya, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

(2) Hassan Sabbaghi, University of Torbat-e Jam, Torbat-e Jam, Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran.

(3) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

(4) Nafis Tasneem Binti, Bangladesh Agricultural Univrsity, Bangladesh.

(5) Ramadhani Chaniago, University of Muhammadiyah Luwuk, Indonesia.

(6) Talabi Olaoluwa Temitope, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

(7) Tri Siswati, Indonseia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sana Jhansi Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bambang Kunarto, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA