Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuela Chukwuma, Centra health Institute, North America.

(2) Saumya Singh, United Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chukwurah Ejike F, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuela Chukwuma, North America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saumya Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Vijaya Peterraj, University of Madras, India.

(2) Shyam R. Sihare, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Gov. College, India.

(3) Suji Pramila R, Mar Baselios Institute of Technology and Science (MBITS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Vijaya Peterraj, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shyam R. Sihare, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Suji Pramila R, Indiac) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Venkata Rao, Anurag University, India.

(2) Valentyna Meshkova, Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon.

(2) Malini Shetty A.G, Surana College/Bangalore University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Venkata Rao, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Valentyna Meshkova, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R.Hepzi Pramila Devamani, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Lekshmi Gangadhar, Noorul Islam Center for Higher Education, India.

(2) Emk Ikball Ahamed, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lekshmi Gangadhar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Emk Ikball Ahamed, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Rosanna D. Gonzales, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

(2) Rachel l. Rodriguez, Basilan State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lavinia Nadrag, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

(2) Padma Priya P V, University of Kerala, India.

(3) Shaik Rehana Banu, Windsor University, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rosanna D. Gonzales, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rachel l. Rodriguez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Olexandr Yemelyanov, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Prakash B. Kundaragi, SDVS Sangh’s Annapoorna Institute of Management Research, India.

(2) T. S. Leelavati, S R Gudlavalleru Enginering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amrita Majumdar, Jharkhand Rai University, India.

(2) Aneesya Panicker, Gla University, India.

(3) Darrell Norman Burrell, Marymount University, USA.

(4) Prettysha Curtis, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prakash B. Kundaragi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. S. Leelavati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, And University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Suma Priyanka Boddeda, India.

(2) Bharat Joshi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suma Priyanka Boddeda, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bharat Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Him Lal Shrestha, Kathmandu Forestry College, Koteshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pratik, India.

(2) Sistla Ravi Kumar, Vignan’s Institute of Information Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sumathi Ramesh, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pratik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sistla Ravi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sugeng Wiyono, Jakarta Health Polytechnic II, Indonesia.

(2) Ayusi Satapathy, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Catalin Constantin Paunescu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agussalim, Indonesia.

(2) Elizabeth Aleru, Lead City University, Nigeria.

(3) Emmanuel Olagboye Taiwo, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Nigeria.

(4) Silviu Petrescu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sugeng Wiyono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayusi Satapathy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Catalin Constantin Paunescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Debanjan Chakraborty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Vidhin Sundar Kamble, Sangola College, Solapur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gustavo Bich, National University Of Misiones, Argentina.

(2) Mukesh Nitharwal, RARI, SKNU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debanjan Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vidhin Sundar Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA