Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jason Ben R. Paragamac, University of Mindanao, Philippines.

(2) Dan Razvan Popoviciu, “Ovidius” University, Romania.

(3) Payal Mago, University of Delhi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jason Ben R. Paragamac, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dan Razvan Popoviciu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Payal Mago, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, North western Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Alejandro Rodriguez, Institute of Meteorology of Cuba, Cuba.

(2) AL Fathima, Periyar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alejandro Rodriguez, Cuba) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (AL Fathima, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmood Ali Mohammed, University of the Cumberlands, USA.

(2) Lakshmi Priya Bachina, India.

(3) Gift Adene, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmood Ali Mohammed, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Priya Bachina, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gift Adene, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Tariq Rasheed, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

(3) Lekha, Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Tariq Rasheed, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravi Kumar Rajak, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lekha, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Howaida Moawad Ahmed Ali, Benha University, Egypt and Najran University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Mai Mohamed Elhassan Mustafa, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Howaida Moawad Ahmed Ali, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mai Mohamed Elhassan Mustafa, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zarqa University, Jordan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yousef Fathi Yousef Fahajan, Al-Aqsa University, Palestine.

(2) Susan Annie George, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yousef Fathi Yousef Fahajan, Palestine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Susan Annie George, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vino Anand S, Government Arignar Anna Memorial Cancer Hospital, India.

(2) Hashem Aliter, Saint John University Hospital, Canada.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vino Anand S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hashem Aliter, Canada) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Italy

Reviewers:

(1) Puia Dragos, University for Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T Popa, Romania.

(2) Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Puia Dragos, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nelmie P. Ponio, J. H. Cerilles State College, Philippines.

(2) Mutari Abubakari, CSIR-SARI, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nelmie P. Ponio, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mutari Abubakari, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA