Peer Review History: Clinical Characteristics Analysis of Bronchopneumonia in Children: A Retrospective Study Based on 418 Cases

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Serpil Ünver Saraydın, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Primi Kumar, Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Rakibul Hasan, United Kingdom.

(3) Sarah A. Babani, Kirkuk University, Iraq.

(4) Taskina Mosleh, Bangladesh Medical University (Former BSMMU), Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Antonio Ramos Martínez, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Spain.

(2) Archana, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kishanganj, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Primi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakibul Hasan, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sarah A. Babani, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Taskina Mosleh, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flanged Components for Design and Optimisation of Stamping Dies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun  , China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sundar Singh Sivam S.P, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Veduru Venkatrami Reddy, Sai Spurthi Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deni Afriatna MT,  Insititut Teknologi Nasional Bandung,  Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sundar Singh Sivam S.P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Veduru Venkatrami Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design Simplification through AI-Enabled Part Clustering and Consolidation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. P. Elangovan, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Asish Kumar Akash, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Nitin Girdhar Shinde, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdulgader Alsharif, Colleage Of Technical Sciences- Sabha, Libya.

(2) A.Devendran, Woxsen University, India.

(3) Afokhainu Segun Agbadua, National Engineering Design Development Institute (NEDDI), Nigeria.

(4) Ashish Kumar Thakur, Mekelle University Ethiopia, And Echelon Institute of Technology, India.

(5) T Vijay Muni, K L Deemed to be University, India.

(6) Viraj Tathavadekar, Symbiosis International University, India.

(7) V.Saravanan, Arunai Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asish Kumar Akash, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nitin Girdhar Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Four Dimensions of True Cost Accounting and the role of Institutional Isomorphism

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ailincă Alina Georgeta, Romania.

(2) Jesus Morgan Asch, Costa Rica.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ailincă Alina Georgeta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jesus Morgan Asch, Costa Rica) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from the Nasal Mucosa of Medical Students at University Center in the Northwest Region, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatma Mohammad Nasr, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Noor Saber Jawad,  Iraq.

(2) Vinoth Kumarasamy, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Animesh Panda, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noor Saber Jawad,  Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinoth Kumarasamy, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Animesh Panda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Role of Comorbidities Associated with Tuberculosis in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shambaditya Goswami, Divine College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Monika Sultana, Primeasia University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Byron Leonel Saraguro Ramirez, C.C.Q.A Hospital del dia El Batan, Ecuador.

(2) Pravas Ranjan Sahoo, Odisha University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(3) Sukumar Debnath, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shambaditya Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Sultana, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Characterization of Biofilm Forming Enterococcus spp. Isolated from Patients with Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Peetam Singh, Subharti Medical College, India.

(2) Laniya Nasrin K, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fattma A.Ali, Hawler Medical University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Peetam Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Laniya Nasrin K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Tomato Fruit

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Tijoy Lowore, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (LUANAR), Malawi.

(2) Katke S. D, MIT College of Food Technology, India.

(3) Hammed Bukola Aishat, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kohinur Begum, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tijoy Lowore, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Katke S. D, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hammed Bukola Aishat, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability, Heritability, and Genetic Advance for Early Seedling Vigour Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Laboratory Screening for Wet Direct Seeded Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahendar Singh Bhinda, ICAR- Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan, India.

(2) Gedifew Gebrie, Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahendar Singh Bhinda, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gedifew Gebrie, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Ustilaginoidea virens Infection on Seed Germination and Vigour in Tolerant and Susceptible Rice Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed Al-Keraway, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Askar Ghanbari Odivi, Sharekord University, Iran.

(2) Shyamrao Kulkarni, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjoy Shil, BCKV, India.

(2) Visakhonuo Kuotsu, Nagaland University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Askar Ghanbari Odivi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shyamrao Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yogesh Pandharinath Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA