Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Muhilan, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Jagadeesh U, College of Agriculture, UAS, and GKVK, India.

(3) Gopa Shome, Chandernagore College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Muhilan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jagadeesh U, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gopa Shome, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Avimanyu Palit, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(2) Musabayana Zivanayi, Gwanda State University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avimanyu Palit, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Musabayana Zivanayi, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Tahir Anwar, Ministry of National Food Security and Research, Pakistan.

(2) Vishal Yadav, MB Veterinary College Dungarpur Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Tahir Anwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vishal Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shoma Hore, Bangladesh.

(2) Rajneesh Kumar, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (SKUAST–K), India.

(3) Mahendru Kumar Gautam, Shobhit University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shoma Hore, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajneesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahendru Kumar Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Alyautdin Renad N, Sechenov University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasanna Babu Racheeti, Shree Velagapudi Ramakrishna Memorial College, Nagaram, India.

(2) Shabnam Ain, Sanskar College of Pharmacy and Research, India.

(3) K.V. Ratnamala, RBVRR Women’s College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Amrita Thakur, Vishwakarma University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasanna Babu Racheeti, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shabnam Ain, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K.V. Ratnamala, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Amrita Thakur, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Kedir Aliyi Koroche, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Aslı Alkan, Fırat University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kedir Aliyi Koroche, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aslı Alkan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandramaniya Chiragkumar Pravinbhai, Anand Agricultural University (AAU), INDIA.

(2) Khose Suyog Balasaheb, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandramaniya Chiragkumar Pravinbhai, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khose Suyog Balasaheb, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Bishnupriya Mohanty, Gomantak Ayurveda Mahavidyalaya and Research Centre, India.

(2) Kuleswan Pame, Assam Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bishnupriya Mohanty, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kuleswan Pame, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakiya Abdullahi, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(2) Mahaveer Prasad Ola, Vivekananda Global University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakiya Abdullahi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahaveer Prasad Ola, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sitesh Chatterjee, India.

(2) Bhagyashree Khamari, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sitesh Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhagyashree Khamari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA