Peer Review History: Epidemiological Profile of Leprosy in the State of Pará between the Years 2019 and 2023

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan INCE, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Fabrício M. de Almeida, UFRO, Brasil.

(2) Ruma Devi, Lakhimpur College of Veterinary Science, AAU, India.

(3) Gaurav Bhatnagar, Maharashtra Institute of Physiotherapy, India.

(4) Zainab Sahib A. Quraish, Al Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.6/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fabrício M. de Almeida, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruma Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gaurav Bhatnagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Zainab Sahib A. Quraish, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Suitable Tree Species for Biochar Production and Their Performance in Enriching Soil Quality and Plant Growth of Oryza sativa L. and Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Ex Benth

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Arthur Fernandes Goncalves, Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), Brazil.

(2) Dumitru Gabriela, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arthur Fernandes Goncalves, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dumitru Gabriela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Satisfaction with the Quality of Educational Services in the BS Mathematics Graduates, College of Science, University of Eastern Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Princess L. Varona, Saint Michael College of Caraga, Philippines.

(2) Faiza binti Omar, IJN College, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Princess L. Varona, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Faiza binti Omar, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding the Digital Generation: The Role of Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction in Users’ Acceptance Intention of the Ruangguru Application among Generations Y, Z and Alpha

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Elizer M. Rebucas, Tagum City College of Science and Technology Foundation Inc, Philippines.

(2) Kadek Wiweka, Sahid Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(3) Anupam Chanda, Bahona College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elizer M. Rebucas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kadek Wiweka, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anupam Chanda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Strategic Capacity Building on Performance of National Non-Governmental Organizations in Rukungiri District, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Veena Angadi, Bangalore City University, India.

(2) Harmony Mark-Ewa Eyal, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Onesmus Musau Mwanzia, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Veena Angadi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Harmony Mark-Ewa Eyal, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Onesmus Musau Mwanzia, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Potential of Lesser-Known Vegetables in Managing Hypercholesterolemia in Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Garima Singh, G. D Goenka University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Garima Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Qamar Shahzad Ahmed, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Psychosocial Challenges in Mortuary Practice in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Satyendra Mani Vikram, Jannayak Chandrashekhar University, Ballia, India.

(2) Srinetra Reddy Madderla, Chandigarh University, United States of America.

(3) Fatma Zehra Fidan, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Satyendra Mani Vikram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srinetra Reddy Madderla, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fatma Zehra Fidan, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Nutrient Balance for Enhanced Productivity and Quality of Anthurium andreanum in Soilless Culture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania, University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Namita Bisht, Willian Carey University, India.

(2) Md Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, Rajshahi University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Namita Bisht, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA