Peer Review History: Studies on Sensory Attributes of Kulfi Blended with Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Kernel Extract and Enriched with Whey Protein Powder

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Anindita Mali, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mona Abd El-Kader Mohamed Abd El-Gawad, National research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anindita Mali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mona Abd El-Kader Mohamed Abd El-Gawad, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Haematological and Serum Biochemical Profiles in Sheep Fed Megathyrsus maximus Hay Supplemented with Urea- Mineral Block Only or in Combination with Leucaena leucocephala

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(2) Vijayakumar Chinnathambi, Veterinary College and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hamada Mahmoud Yousif, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Egypt.

(2) Zirak M R Palani, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zirak M R Palani, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijayakumar Chinnathambi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Fuzzy Cost Optimization Approach in Smart Waste Collection FM/FM/1 Queueing System with Hexagonal Numbers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandrika Dadhirao, GITAM Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Michael Funso Adaramola, Lagos State University Of Science  And Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandrika Dadhirao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Michael Funso Adaramola, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Two Extracts (Aqueous and Lipidic) of P. aquilinum of Cross Plant

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. ABROUKI  Younes  , Mohammed V University in Rabat,  Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Kalathil Sethumadhavan Abhilash, Government Victoria College, Kerala, India.

(2) Jason Ben Romano-Paragamac, University of Mindanao, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.K.M. Anu Geetham, D.G.GOVT Arts College For Women, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kalathil Sethumadhavan Abhilash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jason Ben Romano-Paragamac, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: RegTech and Blockchain Integration in AML Compliance: Financial and Operational Impacts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejesh Reddy Singasani, University of Cumberlands, USA.

(2) Mirko Smoljic, University North, Republic of Croatia.

(3) Sakila Akter Jahan, Illinois State University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zmarialy Yousufi, Institute of Management in Kerala (IMK), University of Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tejesh Reddy Singasani, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mirko Smoljic, Republic of Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sakila Akter Jahan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Demographic Determinants of Millet Commercialization in Rainfed Hilly Regions: Evidence from a North Himalayan State of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghanshyam Dos, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti Language University, India.

(2) Tapas Panda, Ravenshaw University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghanshyam Dos, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tapas Panda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Educational Intervention on Knowledge of Rural Adolescent Girls regarding Menstruation Hygiene Management (MHM)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Doutora Ana Pedro, Aveiro University, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Divyaparvathy J, Tagore Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Deepa Mukherjee, SGT University, India.

(3) Sabastian Samuel Kwesi Afari, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Acsah Regulas, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divyaparvathy J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepa Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sabastian Samuel Kwesi Afari, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Policies, Practices and Challenges of Mainstreaming Gender in Cities: A Case of India’s Smart Cities Mission

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Sindhuja, Alagappa University, India.

(2) Ruth Nsibirano, Makerere University, Uganda.

(3) Gutema Adem, Madda Walabu University , Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Sindhuja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruth Nsibirano, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gutema Adem, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Sesame Yield through Integrated Weed and Nutrient Management: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Ariful Islam, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Soustav Datta, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Ariful Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Soustav Datta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Ethnobotanical and Pharmacological Aspects of Traditional Medicinal Plants in Somalia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

(3) Dr. Somdet Srichairatanakool, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Alpa K. Patel, SICES Degree College of Arts, India.

(2) Dileep Kumar Banisetti, Maharajah’s College, India.

(3) Meghali Kalita, Gauhati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alpa K. Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dileep Kumar Banisetti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meghali Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA