Peer Review History: DSP Implemented One Cycle Control for Duty Cycle Optimization in Wide Input Voltage Range Boost Converters

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) C.C. Hong, Hsiuping University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Varaha Narasimha Raja Chilukoti, Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences (A), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Low Khee Lam, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C.C. Hong, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Varaha Narasimha Raja Chilukoti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Social Media Exposure on Consumer Behavior and Purchase Decisions of Consumer Products

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Abdul Rahuman, Sadakathullah Appa College ( Autonomous ), India.

(2) Kantilal Tamhane, Tatyasaheb Kore Institute of Engineering Technology and Management, India.

(3) Uma Gulati, Institute of Technology and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nidhi, Maharaja Agrasen University, India.

(2) Syed Siddiqua Begum, B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Abdul Rahuman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kantilal Tamhane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Uma Gulati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Stress Management on Employee Job Performance: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban StateTechno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) M.Kavitha, Guru Nanak College, Chennai University of Madras, India.

(2) Saba Inamdar, Presidency University, India.

(3) S.S.Jeyaraj, Staffordshire University, UK and Guangxi Minzu University, P.R.China.

(4) Rahul Kumar, Jaypee University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Naresh Charan Saxena, Slovenia.

(2) Nurul Muna Najiah binti Sued, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Setiasih Dra, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bhakti Pembangunan, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M.Kavitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saba Inamdar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.S.Jeyaraj, P.R.China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rahul Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges to Mainstreaming TVET in Bangladesh: Understanding the Gaps Between Policy and Practice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Onyango Benard Okelo, Kenya.

(2) Bongani June Mwale, Republic of South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Onyango Benard Okelo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bongani June Mwale, Republic of South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recommendations for the Management of Migraine in Paediatric Patients: A Systemic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampoornam. W, Bhavani College of Nursing, India.

(2) Celestine Emeka Ekwuluo, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Enrique Wulff, Institución Milá y Fontanals de investigación en Humanidades (IMF-CSIC), Spain.

(2) Pankaj Ramdas Khuspe, College of Pharmacy, Paniv, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampoornam. W, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Celestine Emeka Ekwuluo, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Transformation in Pharmaceutical Operations: A Comprehensive Review of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Teja Krishna Kota, New England College, USA.

(2) Jasmin Bharadiya, University of the Cumberland, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jayendra Jadhav, Vishwakarma University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Teja Krishna Kota, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jasmin Bharadiya, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Scalable Content Creation for Micro-Influencer Marketing Agencies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vishal K. Pandya, Shri V.J. Modha College of IT, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nurul Raihen, University of Toledo, USA.

(2) Osowomuabe Njama-Abang, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(3) Kandadi Thirupathi Reddy, Chaitanya deemed to be university , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nurul Raihen, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Osowomuabe Njama-Abang, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kandadi Thirupathi Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mamadu Variational Iteration Method for the Solution of Time-Fractional Telegraph Equation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Asiya Ansari, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

(2) Halil ANAÇ, Gumushane University, Türkiye.

(3) Vinod Varghese, M.G. College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asiya Ansari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Halil ANAÇ, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vinod Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Fertility Transitions: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, , Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahendra Dwivedi, Maharana Pratap School of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Farhang Salehi, Iran.

(3) C.A.Daphine Desona Clemency, Sathyabama Institute of Science And Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahendra Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farhang Salehi, Iran C.A.Daphine Desona Clemency, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (C.A.Daphine Desona Clemency) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spectrophotometric Investigation of the Solubilization and Thermodynamics of Eriochrome Blue Black R in Cationic, Nonionic and Zwitterionic Surfactant Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Asst. Prof. Natt Makul, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Chergui Yamina, University oh Ahmed Draia, Algeria.

(2) Eric Selorm Agorku, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chergui Yamina, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eric Selorm Agorku, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA