Peer Review History: A Study of Energy Potential of Substrates of Plantain (Musa paradisiaca) of NZerekore Prefecture, Republic of Guinea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Dr. Jean Beguinot, University of Bourgogne, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Emile St-Pierre, Osaka University, Japan.

(2) Biswanath Kumar Saha, Mongkut’s University Of Technology, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emile St-Pierre, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Biswanath Kumar Saha, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Promoting Integrity in Bhutan’s Cottage and Small-scale Industries: Challenges, Opportunities, and Policy Implications for Private Sector Governance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kamarulzaman Ab. Aziz, Multimedia University,Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Maryem Jmahri, CHOUAIB DOUKKALI UNIVERSITY, MOROCCO.

(2) G. Anuradha Reddy, Aristotle PG College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harshal Anil Salunkhe, Dr. Vishwanath Karad, MIT World  Peace University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maryem Jmahri, MOROCCO) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G. Anuradha Reddy, India) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Removal of Copper (ii) ions from Synthetic Waste Water Using Fe2O3 Magnetic Nanoparticles

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Argha Modak, Burdwan University, India.

(2) Abdullahi Abdulsalam, University of Texas at El Paso, USA.

(3) Aniekan E. Akpakpan, Akwa Ibom State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Veeravelan, Sir Issac Newton Arts & Science College (Bharathidasan University), India.

(2) Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, National Research Centre (NRC), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Argha Modak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullahi Abdulsalam, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aniekan E. Akpakpan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Malaria and Hepatitis B Virus Co-Infection among Pregnant Women Attending Rock Foundation Hospital and Maternity Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Samy El-Shafey, Tanta University, Egypt.

(2) Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(3) Avishek Bhadra, R G Kar Medical College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(2) FENO Daniel Rajaonasy, University of Toamasina, Madagascar.

(3) Massreshaw Assnakew Abebe, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(4) Solomon Tesfaye, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Samy El-Shafey, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aya Raed Abdulwahaab Alheany, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Avishek Bhadra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Feminist Perspective on the Experiences of Filipino Domestic Workers in Hong Kong: A Phenomenological Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Febrina Nur Ramadhani, Indonesia.

(2) Bunga Aprillia, Padjajaran University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Febrina Nur Ramadhani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bunga Aprillia, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Urinary Urobilinogen: An Overlooked Diagnostic Clue in Early Hepatic and Hemolytic Disorders

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arulselvan Palanisamy, Muthayammal College of Arts and Science, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Marinela Enculescu, Romania.

(2) Natalia Vilmosh, Medical University Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marinela Enculescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Natalia Vilmosh, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diabetes Prediction Using Machine Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) V.USHA, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Adari Ramesh, Adichunchunagiri University, India.

(3) Thoutireddy Shilpa, B V Raju Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.USHA, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adari Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Thoutireddy Shilpa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Different Seasons on the Motility and Kinetics Parameters of Deep-frozen Semen in Simmental Bulls

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) V.R. Patodkar, India.

(2) Binod Kumar Bharti, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

(3) Niranjan D, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.R. Patodkar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Binod Kumar Bharti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Niranjan D, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Introduction and Reexamination of Hyperprobability and Superhyperprobability: Comprehensive Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) M. N. Bharathi, Vels University, India.

(2) Ubaid Asif Farooqui, Maharishi University of Information Technology, India.

(3) Jaydip Bhattacharya, Bir Bikram Memorial College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. N. Bharathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ubaid Asif Farooqui, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jaydip Bhattacharya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Presepsin Examination in Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis Compared to CRP, hsCRP, MPV, I:T Ratio, NLR, and Pre-Analytical Factors

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center,  University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaykumar Rameshkumar Jakasaniya, GMERS Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Oumaima Anachad, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashwini R.C, JJM Medical College ,Davangere ,Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Karthik S, SRI Devaraj Urs Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaykumar Rameshkumar Jakasaniya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oumaima Anachad, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA